Leitlinienprogramm OnkologiePsycho-oncology

13. Quality indicators – Psycho-oncology

Version 2.0 · May 2023 · AWMF 032-051OL
Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie · Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft · Deutsche Krebshilfe · AWMF

Quality indicators are measured variables whose collection serves to assess the quality of the underlying structures, processes or results. Quality indicators are an important quality management tool [1190]. The aim of their use is the continuous improvement of care by presenting the results of care, critically reflecting on them and, if necessary, improving them. The present selection of quality indicators was created according to the methodology of the German Guideline Program in Oncology [1191]. For the derivation process, a „Quality Indicators Working Group“ (WG QI) was constituted. This group created the final set of quality indicators based on the already existing quality indicators of the 2014 Guideline Psycho-oncology and, the new strong recommendations („shall“) from the updated Guideline Psycho-oncology. In addition, the group took into consideration the results of the search for existing national and international quality indicators. Results of the already existing quality indicators from the Certified Cancer Centers were not available. The methodology and composition of the WG QI are outlined in the Guideline Report (see https://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/leitlinien/psychoonkologie/).

After two online meetings of this WG, two new quality indicators (QIs) were defined and one existing QI (QI 5: Psycho-oncological interventions: Concepts and general principles for the indication of psycho-oncological treatment) was omitted.

The final set thus consists of 8 QIs (QI 5 unoccupied).

Table 11: Quality indicators

  • The numerator is always a subset of the denominator.
  • None of the quality indicators are to be documented with the basic oncology data set of the cancer registries. (As of 06/2022).

Structural requirements of psycho-oncological care areas: cross-sector coordination of psycho-oncological care (since 2014).

Numerator

Denominator patients receiving information about psycho-oncology support services.

Denominator

All cancer patients with initial diagnosis, recurrence or first distant metastasis

Quality target / reference range

EK 

Notes

Supplementary notes:
Definition „"Psycho-oncological support service": psychosocial counseling, individual or group psychotherapeutic intervention, psychoeducational intervention, couples intervention, relaxation procedures, provided by the appropriately qualified person.

The aim of the indicator: the facility should provide the patient with specific contacts as an example reference. This is intended to encourage the formation of networks within and across facilities.

Reference recommendations

4.10 · Consensus-based Recommendation · checked 2023

Patient-oriented information about psycho-oncological support services shall be provided at an early stage and accompany the course of the disease.

Consensus
Strong consensus (100%)
References
[118]

Recommendation in chapter

Structural requirements of psycho-oncological care areas: self-help (modified 2022)

Numerator

Patients of the denominator who have received information about cancer self-help support services.

Denominator

All cancer patients with initial diagnosis, recurrence or first distant metastasis

Quality target / reference range

EK

Notes

Additional note: The information can be conveyed by flyer, the flyer should be handed over personally. In the flyer, the institution in question states specifically where which offer can be found and names contact persons.

Reference recommendations

4.7 · Consensus-based Recommendation · checked 2023

Cancer patients and their relatives shall be informed about qualified support services offered by cancer self-help/peer-support groups (discussions with people affected by the same disease, assistance in dealing with the disease, therapies and effects of therapy in everyday life) in all phases of the care process.

Consensus
Strong consensus (98%)

Recommendation in chapter

Diagnostics: Screening, Diagnostic Procedures (modified 2022)

Numerator

Patients of the denominator who were screened psycho-oncologically*.

Denominator

Primary case patients + patients with new (local) recurrence and/or distant metastases

Quality target / reference range

Literature on validated screening instruments with a defined cut-off: see chapter 7.3.1. 

Notes

Distress screening includes the implementation of a valid distress instrument (analogous to BestPractice [1] or S3 guideline Psycho-oncological diagnosis, counseling and treatment of adult cancer patients:

  • Distress Thermometer (DT),
  • the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS),
  • the Cancer Patient Stress Questionnaire (FBK),
  • the depression module of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) or
  • the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7)).

Reference recommendations

7.4 · Evidence-based Recommendation · modified 2023

Validated and standardized screening instruments shall be used to assess psychosocial distress.

The screening instruments that shall be used are the Distress Thermometer (DT), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Questionnaire on Distress in Cancer Patients (FBK), the Depression Module of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), or the Generalizied Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7).

Recommendation grade
A: Starke Empfehlung für oder gegen ein Maßnahme - verwendete Ausdrucksweise = soll/soll nicht
Level of evidence
1b
Consensus
Consent (87%)
References
[467] [468] [469] [470] [471] [472] [473] [474] [475] [476] [477] [478] [479] [480] [336] [481] [482] [339] [483] [484] [485] [486]
Change noteEC: Validated and standardized screening instruments should be used to assess psychosocial stress. The distress thermometer or the HADS-D are recommended as screening instruments. In addition, individual psychosocial support needs should be assessed.

Recommendation in chapter

7.2 · Consensus-based Recommendation · modified 2023

All cancer patients shall be screened for psychosocial stress.

Consensus
Strong consensus (96%)
Change noteAll patients should be screened for psychosocial stress. Psycho-oncological screening should be performed as early as possible, at appropriate intervals, if clinically indicated, or repeatedly during the course of the disease if a patient's disease status changes (e.g., recurrence or progression of the disease).

Recommendation in chapter

7.3 · Consensus-based Recommendation · modified 2023

Psycho-oncological screening should be performed as early as possible, at appropriate intervals, during the course of the disease, when clinically indicated or if a patient's disease status changes (e.g., recurrence or progression of the disease).

Consensus
Strong consensus (96%)
Change noteAll patients should receive screening for psychosocial distress. Psycho-oncological screening should be performed as early as possible at appropriate intervals, when clinically indicated, or repeatedly during the course of the disease if there is a change in a patient's disease status (e.g., recurrence or progression of the disease).

Recommendation in chapter

Diagnostics: Diagnostic procedures (since 2014)

Numerator

Patients of the denominator with a diagnostic interview for clarification of psychosocial stress and mental comorbidity

Denominator

All cancer patients with initial diagnosis, recurrence or first distant metastasis and with positive screening for psychosocial distress.

Quality target / reference range

EK

Notes

Definition „Diagnostic interview“: The diagnostic interview includes the identification of psychosocial stress, mental disorders and other problem situations with the aim of describing existing problems and disorders and their change. In addition, clarification is made as to whether these problem situations are subsyndromal or fulfill the criteria for a mental disorder. The clarification and classification of the existing problems and disorders is carried out according to a classification system (ICD-10 or DSM IV), whereby in the diagnosis of a clinically relevant comorbid disorder, the differentiation from somatic complaints or an appropriate psychological reaction to the tumor disease as well as the appropriate consideration of biological-organic consequences of the cancer disease or treatment must be taken into account.

Actors: Specialists in psycho-oncology

Reference recommendations

7.6 · Consensus-based Recommendation · checked 2023

If the screening is positive and/or there is a subjective need for support identified, a diagnostic interview shall be offered to clarify psychosocial distress, psychiatric comorbidity, as well as the need for support and treatment.

Consensus
Consent (90%)

Recommendation in chapter

Psycho-oncological Interventions: Concepts and general principles for the indication of psycho-oncological treatment (Deleted Version 2).

Reference recommendations

Psycho-oncological Interventions: Concepts and general principles for the indication of psycho-oncological treatment, psychosocial counseling (modified 2022).

Numerator

Patients of the denominator with offer of psychosocial counseling with psychological and social focus

Denominator

Cancer patients with initial diagnosis, recurrence or first distant metastasis

Quality target / reference range

EK

Notes

Supplementary note: Psychosocial counseling should be offered personally by social workers/social pedagogues and psycho-oncology specialists (cf. QI 2: the personal handing over of a flyer).

Actors: Social workers/social pedagogues and psycho-oncology professionals.

Reference recommendations

8.27 · Consensus-based Recommendation · modified 2023

Psychosocial counseling with a psychological and social focus shall be offered to cancer patients and their relatives in all phases of the disease according to their needs and as early as possible.

 

Consensus
Strong consensus (98%)
Change notePsychosocial counseling should be offered to cancer patients and their relatives in all phases of the disease, according to their needs and as early as possible.

Recommendation in chapter

8.2 · Consensus-based Recommendation · modified 2023

Patients with no or low distress (determined through screening and further diagnostics) shall be offered or given patient-oriented information and psychosocial counseling.

Consensus
Strong consensus (97,2%)
Change notePatients with no or low burden (determined via screening and by further diagnostics) should be offered patient-oriented information and psychosocial counseling.

Recommendation in chapter

Patient-centered communication: training interventions to improve practitioners' communication skills and their effectiveness (modified 2022)

Numerator

All physicians and nurses with quality-assured communication skills training to improve their communication skills.

Denominator

All physicians and nurses working in the field of oncology.

Quality target / reference range

EK

Literature: Barth and Lannen (2011)

Notes

Supplementary note: Continuing education and training measures to teach specific interview skills: Postgraduate; number of teaching units must be proven (e.g. certificate of participation). Training should be at least 3 days (24 hours) in length.

Reason for deviation of the QI from the guideline recommendation: In accordance with the prioritization of measures of the National Cancer Plan, the focus is on physicians and nurses, as these two professional groups are considered to have priority in patient care. It can be assumed that psychotherapeutic practitioners have been taught communication and conversation skills in their respective basic training.

Reference recommendations

11.12 · Consensus-based Recommendation · modified 2023

Physicians and other professionals working in oncology should participate in a quality-assured communication skills training to improve their communication skills.

Consensus
Strong consensus (97%)
Change notePhysicians and other professional groups working in oncology should undergo further education and training measures to improve their communication skills.

Recommendation in chapter

Human resources (new 2022)

Numerator

Cumulative full-time equivalent psycho-oncology positions of the center/non-certified clinic.

Denominator

All cancer patients* with the exception of prostate or melanoma patients with initial diagnosis, locoregional recurrence, or secondary distant metastasis at the center/non-certified clinic.

Quality target / reference range

Target: ≥ 0.0033

Notes

Note:
Denominator must be adapted to specific organs per entity.
Prostate and melanoma patients should also be cared for, but the requirement of one full-time psycho-oncologist for 300 cases per year does not apply.

Reference recommendations

12.2 · Consensus-based Recommendation · new 2023

In certified centers as well as in non-certified clinics, one full-time psycho-oncological staff member shall be provided for every 300 cases per year for all oncological diagnoses with the exception of prostate cancer or melanoma patients.

Consensus
Consent (79%)
References
[1187]

Recommendation in chapter

Suitable premises (new 2022)

Numerator

Number of suitable rooms, which are available for psycho-oncological conversations

Denominator

Full-time equivalent psycho-oncology = cancer patients* other than prostate or melanoma patients with initial diagnosis, locoregional recurrence, or secondary distant metastasis * 0.0033 at center/non-certified clinic

Notes

Annotation:

Suitable rooms = Undisturbed consultation, furniture, confidential and pleasant atmosphere.

Reference recommendations

12.2 · Consensus-based Recommendation · new 2023

In certified centers as well as in non-certified clinics, one full-time psycho-oncological staff member shall be provided for every 300 cases per year for all oncological diagnoses with the exception of prostate cancer or melanoma patients.

Consensus
Consent (79%)
References
[1187]

Recommendation in chapter

12.5 · Consensus-based Recommendation · new 2023

In terms of equipment, suitable space shall be provided to allow for undisturbed and confidential psycho-oncological counseling and treatment.

Consensus
Strong consensus (98%)
References
[113] [1188] [1189]

Recommendation in chapter

References

[1190] Qualitätsindikatoren. Manual für AutorenSchriftenreihe ÄZQ, 2009. 36:

[1191] Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF), Entwicklung von leitlinienbasierten Qualitätsindikatoren. Methodenpapier für das Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie, Version 3.0, 2021., http://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/methodik/informationen-zur-methodik/

[118] Dettmers, Stephan, Expertenstandard „Psychosoziale Erstberatung onkologischer Patient*innen durch Soziale Arbeit in der stationären Versorgung“ (PEOPSA)Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Soziale Arbeit in der Onkologie (ASO), Deutsche Vereinigung für Soziale Arbeit im Gesundheitswesen e.V. (DVSG), 2018., https://dvsg.org/fileadmin/user_upload/DVSG/Veroeffentlichungen/Arbeitshilfen/PEOPSA/Expertenstandard-PEOPSA-2018.pdf

[467] Book, K., Marten-Mittag, B., Henrich, G., Dinkel, A., Scheddel, P., Sehlen, S., et.al. Distress screening in oncology-evaluation of the Questionnaire on Distress in Cancer Patients-short form (QSC-R10) in a German sample, Psycho-Oncology, 2011. 20(3): p. 287-293., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20669340/

[468] Erim, Y., Beckmann, M., Gerlach, G., Kümmel, S., Oberhoff, C., Senf, W., et.al. Screening for distress in women with breast cancer diagnosed for the first time: employment of HADS-D and PO-Bado, Zeitschrift Für Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie, 2009. 55(3): p. 248-262., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19886593/

[469] Esser, Peter, Hartung, Tim J., Friedrich, Michael, Johansen, Christoffer, Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich, Faller, Hermann, et.al. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) and the anxiety module of the Hospital and Depression Scale (HADS-A) as screening tools for generalized anxiety disorder among cancer patients, Psycho-Oncology, 2018. 27(6): p. 1509-1516., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29473255

[470] Friedrich, M, Nowe, E, Hofmeister, D, Kuhnt, S, Leuteritz, K, Sender, A, et.al. Psychometric properties of the fatigue questionnaire EORTC QLQ-FA12 and proposal of a cut-off value for young adults with cancer., Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2018. 16 (1)(1): p. 125., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29903021/

[471] Goebel, Simone, Mehdorn, H. Maximilian, Measurement of psychological distress in patients with intracranial tumours: the NCCN distress thermometer, Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2011. 104(1): p. 357-364., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21188470

[472] Hartung, Tim J., Friedrich, Michael, Johansen, Christoffer, Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich, Faller, Herman, Koch, Uwe, et.al. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) as screening instruments for depression in patients with cancer, Cancer, 2017. 123(21): p. 4236-4243., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28654189

[473] Herschbach, P., Book, K., Brandl, T., Keller, M., Marten-Mittag, B., The Basic Documentation for Psycho-Oncology (PO-Bado): an expert rating scale for the psychosocial experience of cancer patients, Onkologie, 2008. 31(11): p. 591-596., https://doi.org/10.1159/000162287

[474] Herschbach, P., Brandl, T., Knight, L., Keller, M., Das subjektive Befinden von Krebskranken einheitlich beschreiben - Vorstellung der Psycho-Onkologischen Basisdokumentation (PO-Bado), Deutsches Ärzteblatt, 2004. 101(12): p. 799-802.

[475] Klingenstein, A, Samel, C, Garip-Kuebler, A, Miller, C, Liegl, RG, Priglinger, SG, et.al. The national comprehensive cancer network distress thermometer as a screening tool for the evaluation of quality of life in uveal melanoma patients., Acta Ophthalmol, 2020. 98 (3)(3): p. e381-e387., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31654488/

[476] Marten-Mittag, B, Book, K, Buchhold, B, Dinkel, A, Gründobler, B, Henrich, G, et.al. The Basic Documentation for Psycho-Oncology Short Form (PO-Bado SF)--an expert rating scale for distress screening: development and psychometric properties., Psychooncology, 2015. 24 (6)(6): p. 653-60., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25346529/

[477] Mehnert, A., Müller, D., Lehmann, C., Koch, U., Neue diagnostische Verfahren. Die deutsche Version des NCCN Distress-Thermometers - Empirische Prüfung eines Screening-Instruments zur Erfassung psychosozialer Belastung bei Krebspatienten, Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 2006. 54(3): p. 213-223., https://doi.org/10.1024/1661-4747.54.3.213

[478] Rapp, M, Schipmann, S, Hoffmann, K, Wiewrodt, R, Steiger, HJ, Kamp, M, et.al. Impact of distress screening algorithm for psycho-oncological needs in neurosurgical patients., Oncotarget, 2018. 9 (60)(60): p. 31650-31663., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30167085/

[479] Renovanz, M, Tsakmaklis, H, Soebianto, S, Neppel, I, Nadji-Ohl, M, Beutel, M, et.al. Screening for distress in patients with intracranial tumors during the first 6 months after diagnosis using self-reporting instruments and an expert rating scale (the basic documentation for psycho-oncology short form - PO-Bado SF)., Oncotarget, 2018. 9 (57)(57): p. 31133-31145., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30123432/

[480] Renovanz, Mirjam, Soebianto, Sari, Tsakmaklis, Helena, Keric, Naureen, Nadji-Ohl, Minou, Beutel, Manfred, et.al. Evaluation of the psychological burden during the early disease trajectory in patients with intracranial tumors by the ultra-brief Patient Health Questionnaire for Depression and Anxiety (PHQ-4), Supportive Care in Cancer: Official Journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019. 27(12): p. 4469-4477., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30904948

[336] Reuter, K., Härter, M., Screening for mental disorders in cancer patients – discriminant validity of HADS and GHQ-12 assessed by standardized clinical interview, Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res., 2001. 10(2): p. 86-96., https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.103

[481] Rumpold, G., Augustin, M., Zschocke, I., Strittmatter, G., Söllner, W., The validity of the Hornheide questionnaire for psychosocial support in skin tumor patients: a survey in an Austrian and German outpatient population with melanoma, Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 2001. 51(1): p. 25-33., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11227322/

[482] Singer, S., Kuhnt, S., Götze, H., Hauss, J., Hinz, A., Liebmann, A., et.al. Hospital anxiety and depression scale cutoff scores for cancer patients in acute care, British Journal of Cancer, 2009. 100(6): p. 908-912., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19240713/

[339] Singer, S., Danker, H., Dietz, A., Hornemann, B., Koscielny, S., Oeken, J., et.al. Screening for mental disorders in laryngeal cancer patients: a comparison of 6 methods, Psycho-Oncology, 2008. 17(3): p. 280-286., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17614095/

[483] Strittmatter, G., Mawick, R., Tilkorn, M., Entwicklung und klinischer Einsatz von Screening‐ Instrumenten zur Identifikation betreuungsbedürftiger Tumorpatienten, in Lebensqualitätsforschung aus medizinpsychologischer und -soziologischer Perspektive. Jahrbuch der Medizinischen Psychologie, Bullinger, M.Siegrist, J. and Ravens-Sieberer, U., Editors. 2000, Hogrefe: Göttingen, Bern, Toronto, Seattle. p. 59-75.

[484] Strittmatter, G., Indikation zur Intervention in der Psychoonkologie. Psychosoziale Belastungen und Ermittlung der Betreuungsbedürftigkeit stationärer Hauttumorpatienten. Internationale Hochschulschriften 228Waxmann, 1997. p. 428.

[485] Tilkorn, M, Mawick, R, Sommerfeld, S, Strittmatter, G, Quality of life of patients with malignant facial and skin tumors--development of a questionnaire and initial findings of a study., Rehabilitation (Stuttg), 1990. 29 (2)(2): p. 134-9., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2367741/

[486] Wüller, Johannes, Küttner, Stefanie, Foldenauer, Ann Christina, Rolke, Roman, Pastrana, Tania, Accuracy of the Distress Thermometer for home care patients with palliative care needs in Germany, Palliative & Supportive Care, 2017. 15(3): p. 288-294., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27666282

[1187] Mehnert-Theuerkauf, Anja, Faller, Hermann, Herschbach, Peter, Hönig, Klaus, Hornemann, Beate, Petermann-Meyer, Andrea, et.al. Psychoonkologischer Versorgungsbedarf in Krebszentren, Der Onkologe, 2020. 26(2): p. 178-184., https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-019-00689-2

[113] Dilworth, Sophie, Higgins, Isabel, Parker, Vicki, Kelly, Brian, Turner, Jane, Patient and health professional's perceived barriers to the delivery of psychosocial care to adults with cancer: a systematic review, Psycho-Oncology, 2014. 23(6): p. 601-612., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24519814

[1188] Neumann, Melanie, Galushko, Maren, Karbach, Ute, Goldblatt, Hadass, Visser, Adriaan, Wirtz, Markus, et.al. Barriers to using psycho-oncology services: a qualitative research into the perspectives of users, their relatives, non-users, physicians, and nurses, Supportive Care in Cancer: Official Journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2010. 18(9): p. 1147-1156., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19727843

[1189] Schofield, Penelope, Carey, Mariko, Bonevski, Billie, Sanson-Fisher, Rob, Barriers to the provision of evidence-based psychosocial care in oncology, Psycho-Oncology, 2006. 15(10): p. 863-872., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16381066