14. Literaturhinweise – Hodgkin Lymphom

Version 3.2 · Oktober 2022 · AWMF 018/029OL
Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie · Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft · Deutsche Krebshilfe · AWMF

Dies sind Publikationen zum GRADE-Ansatz (siehe auch Einführung): [660][661][662][662][663][664][665][666]

Literaturhinweise

[660] Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., et.al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations, BMJ, 2008. 336: p. 924-6., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18436948

[661] Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., Alonso-Coello, P., et.al. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias), J Clin Epidemiol, 2011. 64: p. 407-15., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21247734

[662] Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Woodcock, J., Brozek, J., Helfand, M., et.al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency, J Clin Epidemiol, 2011. 64: p. 1294-302., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21803546

[663] Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., Alonso-Coello, P., Rind, D., et.al. GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision, J Clin Epidemiol, 2011. 64: p. 1283-93., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21839614

[664] Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Woodcock, J., Brozek, J., Helfand, M., et.al. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness, J Clin Epidemiol, 2011. 64: p. 1303-10., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21802903

[665] Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Montori, V., Vist, G., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., et.al. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias, J Clin Epidemiol, 2011. 64: p. 1277-82., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21802904

[666] Balshem, H., Helfand, M., Schunemann, H. J., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., et.al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence, J Clin Epidemiol, 2011. 64: p. 401-6., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21208779