3. Epidemiology – Cervical Carcinoma
Major changes in the chapter on epidemiology
This chapter has hardly been changed. No recommendations are made in it. The data on the incidence and mortality rate for gynecological tumors have been updated on the basis of the current “Cancer in Germany, 2015/2016” report from the Robert Koch Institute, published in 2019.
In addition, new recommendations issued by Germany’s Standing Committee on Vaccines (STIKO) on vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) and the initial results following the introduction of mandatory vaccination in Australia have been added.
F.A. Stübs, M.C. Koch, F. Mergel, M.W. Beckmann
3.1 Incidence and mortality
Cervical cancer is the fourth most common gynecological malignancy worldwide. A total of 528,000 women were newly diagnosed with cervical carcinoma in 2012, and 266,000 women died of the disease. In Germany, this tumor entity has become a less frequent tumor type in recent decades, partly due to early detection. Partly thanks to early detection, cervical carcinoma has become a less frequent type of tumor in Germany over the last few decades. This has led to a reduction in the incidence of invasive cervical carcinoma during the last 30 years — from being the most frequent type of carcinoma among women (in 1971) to the thirteenth most frequent, at 1.9% of the total incidence of all malignancies among women (in 2016) in Germany [3]. This decline in cervical carcinoma is explained, among other factors, by the introduction in 1971 of early detection examinations using a cytological smear, which have made it possible to detect precursors and early stages of cancer in a timely way and treat them successfully [4]. The development and introduction of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines does not explain the observed decline in the incidence, as these vaccines were only included in the recommendations of the Standing Committee on Vaccines (STIKO) in 2007 (GBA decision 2008). However, it is expected that the implementation of HPV vaccination will further reduce the incidence and mortality rates in the future. Since June 2018, the STIKO has also recommended vaccination for boys aged 9–14. This is expected to further reduce the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer provided that sufficient vaccination coverage is achieved, including through herd immunity [5].
IIn Australia, a vaccination program using the quadrivalent vaccine (HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18) was introduced between 2007 and 2009 for girls aged 12–13. Between 2006 and 2009, a reduction in the incidence of HSIL lesions from 0.85% to 0.22% in females under 18 years of age was observed (P = 0.03). No reduction was seen in other groups of patients. The reduction in HSIL lesions was therefore only found in patients who received vaccination [6]. In a cluster-randomized trial of HPV-associated invasive carcinoma, including a total of 9,529 initially 14–17-year-old girls who received the bivalent or quadrivalent HPV vaccine and 17,838 initially 14–19-year-old females without HPV vaccination, eight cervical carcinomas were diagnosed in the unvaccinated women after 7 years and no cervical carcinomas were seen in the vaccinated women. However, the data were not available to the guideline group in the form of a full publication, which is expected in 2021 [7].
A meta-analysis of 20 studies from nine countries including 16,600 women vaccinated against HPV showed a 64% reduction in the incidence of infection with HPV 16 and 18 in women aged 13–19 years (RR 0.36; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.53) [8].
The incidence of more advanced tumor stages (≥ FIGO stage IIB) and the numbers of deaths have declined since 1980, but have been stagnating over the last 10 years. Overall, approximately one in 340 women currently dies of cervical carcinoma in Germany; 30 years ago, the figure was more than twice that [3].
Data from the Robert Koch Institute and GEKID for 2019 report a total of 4380 new patients with cervical carcinoma in 2016, and 1562 deaths from the disease. The incidence in comparison with 2002 (n = 6500 to 4380) has thus clearly declined, and the number of deaths (n = 1700 to 1562) due to cervical carcinoma has fallen slightly [3] [9]. The relative 5-year survival rate for patients with cervical carcinoma was 67% in 2016, while the 10-year survival rate was 63%.
The age distribution shows a peak between 40 and 59 years of age. The mean age at first diagnosis of cervical carcinoma, currently 55, has declined by 15 years during the last 25 years [3]. The mean age at which the disease develops is 34 for preinvasive precursor stages — a mean of 20 years younger [3]. TThe 5-year prevalence was 17,400 women in 2014, slightly lower than the 2016 rate of 17,500. In 2013–2014, 44% of cervical carcinomas were in stage UICC stage I at first diagnosis, 13% in stage II, 23% in stage II, and 20% in stage IV [3].
Table 2: Relative 5- and 10-year survival rates for cervical cancer in relation to UICC stage from the Bavarian Cancer Registry (n=14,606), 1998-2011.
| UICC stage | 0 | I | II | III | IV |
| Relative 5-year survival rate | 100% | 95% | 75% | 58% | 21% |
| Relative 10-year survival rate | 100% | 93% | 71% | 51% | 16% |
UICC stages according to TNM classification: UICC 0 = Tis N0 M0; UICC I = T1 N0 M0; UICC II = T2 N0 M0; UICC III = T3 N0 M0 or T1-3 N1 M0; UICC IV = T4 N0 M0 or T4 N1 M0 or any T any N M1.
Source: Bavarian Cancer Registry, 2013.
Table 3: Incidence and mortality rates for carcinomas specific to women, 2021
| Incidence n = absolute |
Age-standardized incidence in European population per 100,000 |
Total deaths n = absolute |
Age-standardized overall mortality rate in European population per 100,000 |
|
| Women (total) | 340,590 | 105,597 | ||
| Gynecological carcinomas (total) | 95,100 | 153 | 29,155 | 36,7 |
| Breast carcinoma | 68,950 | 112,2 | 18,570 | 23,4 |
| Endometrial carcinoma | 11,090 | 16,5 | 2,600 | 3,0 |
| Ovarian carcinoma | 7,350 | 11,1 | 5,486 | 6,9 |
| Cervical carcinoma | 4,380 | 8,7 | 1,562 | 2,4 |
| Vulvar carcinoma | 3,330 | 4,5 | 937 | 1,0 |
The prognosis for those who develop the disease has improved markedly. The mortality rates have clearly declined since 1980. Table 1 shows the relative 5-year and 10-year survival rates relative to the UICC stage, from the Bavarian Cancer Registry for the period 1988–2011 (n = 14,606).
3.2 Regional differences
The incidence of cervical carcinoma varies worldwide between 3.6 (in Finland) and 45 (in Peru) per 100,000 women per year. In Germany, the incidence in 1971 was 45 per 100,000 (figures for the state of Saarland), while in 2014 it was 9.1 per 100,000 (figures from GEKID for Germany as a whole [10]). In a comparison with the EU countries, Germany’s age-standardized rates for new cases and mortality were thus at place 13 out of 28 countries for incidence and 15 out of 28 for mortality. The Cytology Committee of the 17 Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians reported to the Federal Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians that in 2016 there were 26,453 women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 and 637 women with adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) [11]. Data from Austria show that the incidence of precancerous cervical lesions in women in the 21–30-year-old age group increased significantly in 1985–1989 in comparison with 1980–1984, with a fourfold increase [12]. A similar trend has also been reported in individual studies on populations in Germany [13]. One possible explanation for this might be the higher rate of participation in early detection examinations for early cancer, as well as changes in lifestyle (e.g., nicotine abuse, combination oral contraceptives, earlier sexual activity).
3.3 Histological subtypes
Squamous cell or nonsquamous cell carcinoma, as well as adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma, are the most frequent histological types. Squamous cell carcinoma is present in approximately 80% of cases. The proportion of adenocarcinomas has increased during the last 25 years from 10% to approximately 20% [14] [15] [16]. Other tumor entities such as mixed forms (adenosquamous), neuroendocrine (large cell or small cell) or clear cell or serous papillary carcinomas are rare.
Reasons for the increase in adenocarcinomas may include improved histopathological classification of cervical carcinoma and the increasing role played by cofactors in carcinogenesis; adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) is diagnosed in an endocervical location during screening more rarely than preinvasive squamous cell lesions (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, CIN) [17] [18] [19] [20] [21][22][22][23][24][25] [24]. Research is still continuing to determine whether HPV vaccination is leading to a shift in the histological subtypes. Reference may be made here to the relevant Level 3 guideline on “Prevention of Cervical Carcinoma” (AWMF registry no. 015/27OL) and to the Level 3 guideline on “Vaccine Prevention of HPV-Associated Neoplasia” (AWMF registry no. 082/002).
3.4 Risk factors and disease development
The etiology and pathogenesis of cervical carcinoma have not yet been conclusively explained. The carcinogenetic process is multifactorial, with varying importance and interactions among the influencing factors. Different groups of risk factors for the development of invasive cervical carcinoma have been distinguished:
Major risk factors
- Infection with human papillomavirus (mainly HPV type 16+18; see section 3.4.1)
- Precancerous lesions/dysplasia — low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL); high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)
Nongenetic risk factors / cofactors
[26] [27] [28] [29] [30]
- Smoking (> 15 cigarettes per day)
- Patients with immunosuppression (HIV, medications)
- Early start of sexual activity (< 14 years of age)
- Frequently changing sexual partners (more than four in 10 years)
- Other infections (e.g., genital herpes, chlamydiae, gonococci)
- Low socioeconomic status
- Poor sexual hygiene
- Long-term use of oral contraceptives, > 5 years (for possible confounding factors, see section 3.4.2)
- Large number of births
Genetic risk factors / co-factors
- Additional factors such as genetic variations (somatic) may influence the development of tumors. The extent to which these are of clinical relevance is as yet unclear. They have an odds ratio with just under a twofold increase [31][32]. By comparison, the OR for HPV high-risk positivity is 150, while with HPV 16 positivity it is as high as over 400 [33]. Nicotine abuse, with an OR of 2.17, also represents a higher risk [34]. Research is currently focusing on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the following genes, with no claim to completeness in the listing:
- HPV persistence: IRF 3, OAS3, SULF1, DUT, GTF2H4, FOXP3
- Progression to invasive cervical carcinoma: FANCA, IFNG, EVER1/EVER2, FAS
- Specific to cervical carcinoma: TP 53, CCND1
- Genes with a general disposition toward tumor development: ATM
3.4.1 HPV infection
An underlying infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) is almost always present with cervical carcinoma. Etiologically, the development of cancer is associated with infection with high-risk human papillomaviruses (mainly HPV types 16, 18, 45, 31, 33, 58, 52, 35, 59, 56, 6, 51, 68, 39, 82, 73, 66, and 70). However, the infection only persists in 5–10% of patients and only around 3% of women who are infected with papillomavirus actually develop cervical carcinoma [35].
This topic is discussed in detail in the Level 3 guidelines on “Vaccine Prevention of HPV-Associated Neoplasia” (AWMF registry no. 082/002) and “Prevention of Cervical Carcinoma” (AWMF registry no. 015/027OL), and reference may be made to these. In particular, patients with known immunodeficiency or immunosuppressive therapy and HPV infection require particularly closely scheduled follow-up examinations in the framework of early cancer detection.
3.4.2 Hormonal contraception
There has been discussion regarding an increased risk of cervical carcinoma developing in patients with an existing HPV infection who are simultaneously taking oral contraceptives. The use of mainly combined oral contraceptives (with estrogen and gestagen components) for a longer period (five or more years) is associated with an increased risk for cervical carcinoma [27]. It was shown in an analysis of 24 epidemiological studies that more prolonged use of oral contraceptives is associated with a greater risk of disease [26]. On the other hand, a reduction in risk has been observed after cessation of oral contraceptive use, independently of the previous period of contraceptive use [26].
A report produced in 2002 by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, which is part of the WHO, examined data from eight studies dealing with the association between the use of oral contraceptives and the risk of cervical carcinoma in HPV-infected women. The analysis showed a threefold higher risk among women who had taken oral contraceptives for 5–9 years in comparison with women who had never taken oral contraceptives. In women who had used oral contraceptives for 10 years or longer, the risk of developing cervical carcinoma was four times higher [29]. These findings were confirmed by another cohort study in 2016. Oral contraceptive use was associated with an increased risk of both CIN 3/HSIL and also invasive carcinoma (HR 1.6 and 1.8, respectively, for > 15 years versus never taken). Placement of a hormonal coil appeared to have a protective effect on the development of CIN 3/HSIL or cervical carcinoma. However, this was not statistically significant (OR 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5 to 0.96). The authors of the study explain the protective effect with the chronic inflammatory reaction caused by the coil. This may reduce the persistence of the human papillomavirus [36].
Nearly all cervical carcinomas are caused by high-risk or oncogenic HPV subtypes, and the association with oral contraceptives is probably indirect (as a cofactor). The hormonal influence of oral contraceptives may make the mucosal cells of the cervix more receptive for viral infection, or may diminish local defenses against infection, or may influence the mutation leading to cancer developing in HPV-infected cells. It can be assumed that this indirect path mainly occurs in combination oral contraceptives with estrogen and gestagen components, increasing the risk of mutation. Drugs containing only gestagens (minipills) do not appear to increase the risk of cervical carcinoma developing [26] [28]. Research is currently still continuing on issues involving the development of disease in patients receiving oral contraceptives. It is also possible that long-term contraception may represent a confounding factor (with earlier start of sexual activity, more sexual partners) [28].
3.5 Protective factors
Nutritional factors (e.g., citrus fruit, diet high in vegetables, garlic, onions, vitamins C, E, and A1) may play a protective role to some extent. Stopping smoking and taking steps to avoid genital infections and sexually transmitted diseases are relatively easy ways of reducing risk. A meta-analysis of 17 studies including 7537 women and 4945 cases of cervical cancer showed that the use of an intrauterine device (IUD) reduced the risk of developing cervical cancer (OR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.77). The reduction in incidence was observed in all 17 studies. However, the meta-analysis was to able to drawn any conclusions concerning the duration of IUD use or the type of IUD (e.g., copper vs. hormone) [37].
References
[3] RKI, Krebs in Deutschland für 2015/2016, 2019., https://www.krebsdaten.de/Krebs/DE/Content/Publikationen/Krebs_in_Deutschland/kid_2019/krebs_in_deutschland_2019.pdf;jsessionid=E24C98E8A5A6CD3A1D73BB6A09D30A39.2_cid363?__blob=publicationFile
[4] Seifert, U., Klug, S. J., Early detection of cervical cancer in Germany : Evidence and implementation, Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz, 2014. 57: p. 294-301., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24562703
[5] RKI Epidemiologisches Bulletin Juni 2019, https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Infekt/EpidBull/Archiv/2018/Ausgaben/26_18.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
[6] Brotherton, J. M., Fridman, M., May, C. L., Chappell, G., Saville, A. M., Gertig, D. M., Early effect of the HPV vaccination programme on cervical abnormalities in Victoria, Australia: an ecological study, Lancet, 2011. 377(9783): p. 2085-92.
[7] Luostarinen, T., Apter, D., Dillner, J., Eriksson, T., Harjula, K., Natunen, K., et.al. Vaccination protects against invasive HPV-associated cancers, Int J Cancer, 2018. 142(10): p. 2186-2187., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29280138
[8] Drolet, M., Benard, E., Boily, M. C., Ali, H., Baandrup, L., Bauer, H., et.al. Population-level impact and herd effects following human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Lancet Infect Dis, 2015. 15(5): p. 565-80., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25744474
[9] Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland e.V. (GEKID), 2014. 2014:, https://www.gekid.de/
[10] Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland e.V. (GEKID), 2014. 2019:, https://atlas.gekid.de/CurrentVersion/atlas.html
[11] Marquardt, Katrin, Kossowski, Izabella, Hantschke-Zerbich, Heike, Michel, Frank, An der Schwelle zum organisierten Zervixkarzinomscreening, Der Gynäkologe, 2019. 52(8): p. 622-627.
[12] Kainz, C., Tempfer, C., Gitsch, G., Heinzl, H., Reinthaller, A., Breitenecker, G., Influence of age and human papillomavirus-infection on reliability of cervical cytopathology, Arch Gynecol Obstet, 1995. 256(1): p. 23-8., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7726650, http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FBF00634344.pdf
[13] Blohmer, J. U., Schmalisch, G., Klette, I., Grineisen, Y., Kohls, A., Guski, H., et.al. Increased incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in young women in the Mitte district, Berlin, Germany, Acta Cytol, 1999. 43(2): p. 195-200., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10097709, http://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/330976
[14] Krebs in Deutschland für 2015/2016, Berlin 2019, https://www.krebsdaten.de/Krebs/DE/Content/Publikationen/Krebs_in_Deutschland/krebs_in_deutschland_node.html;jsessionid=CBD18C719CEBE68AD0F1AF7AB03A9E5F.1_cid372
[15] Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Tumorzentren e.V.; 7. Bundesweite Onkologische Qualitätskonferenz 2018 Zervixkarzinom (Available from: http://www.tumorzentren.de/tl_files/dokumente/Qualitaetskonferenzen/7.%20Bundesweite%20Qualitaetskonferenz/Zervix_Qualikonferenz_Jackisch.pdf), 2018., https://www.adt-netzwerk.de/?s=839
[16] Tattersall, M. H., Lorvidhaya, V., Vootiprux, V., Cheirsilpa, A., Wong, F., Azhar, T., et.al. Randomized trial of epirubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy followed by pelvic radiation in locally advanced cervical cancer. Cervical Cancer Study Group of the Asian Oceanian Clinical Oncology Association, J Clin Oncol, 1995. 13(2): p. 444-51., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7844607, http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/13/2/444.full.pdf
[17] Bray, F., Carstensen, B., Moller, H., Zappa, M., Zakelj, M. P., Lawrence, G., et.al. Incidence trends of adenocarcinoma of the cervix in 13 European countries, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2005. 14(9): p. 2191-9., http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/14/9/2191.full.pdf
[18] Liu, S., Semenciw, R., Mao, Y., Cervical cancer: the increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma in younger women, CMAJ, 2001. 164(8): p. 1151-2., http://www.cmaj.ca/content/164/8/1151.full.pdf
[19] Parkin, D. M., Bray, F. I., Devesa, S. S., Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture, Eur J Cancer, 2001. 37 Suppl 8: p. S4-66.
[20] Sasieni, P., Adams, J., Changing rates of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix in England, Lancet, 2001. 357(9267): p. 1490-3., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11377601/
[21] Smith, H. O., Tiffany, M. F., Qualls, C. R., Key, C. R., The rising incidence of adenocarcinoma relative to squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix in the United States--a 24-year population-based study, Gynecol Oncol, 2000. 78(2): p. 97-105., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10926787/
[22] Vinh-Hung, V., Bourgain, C., Vlastos, G., Cserni, G., De Ridder, M., Storme, G., et.al. Prognostic value of histopathology and trends in cervical cancer: a SEER population study, BMC Cancer, 2007. 7: p. 164., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1994954/pdf/1471-2407-7-164.pdf
[23] Visioli, C. B., Zappa, M., Ciatto, S., Iossa, A., Crocetti, E., Increasing trends of cervical adenocarcinoma incidence in Central Italy despite Extensive Screening Programme, 1985-2000, Cancer Detect Prev, 2004. 28(6): p. 461-4., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15582270/
[24] Vizcaino, A. P., Moreno, V., Bosch, F. X., Munoz, N., Barros-Dios, X. M., Parkin, D. M., International trends in the incidence of cervical cancer: I. Adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinomas, Int J Cancer, 1998. 75(4): p. 536-45., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9466653/
[25] C. Jackisch, A. Sackmann, C. Schmid, S. Kim-Wanner, 8. Onkologische Qualitätskonferenz 2020, 2020. 2020:, https://firmensystem.de/tumorzentren_test/bundesweite_datenzusammenfuehrung/qualitaetskonferenzen/bisherige_auswertungen/8._boqk_2020/thumb.php?pdf&b=L3BkZi9RdWFsaXTDpHRza29uZmVyZW56LzIwMjAvWmVydml4X0J1bmRlc3dlaXRlIFF1YWxpa29uZmVyZW56MjAyMF9BRFQucGRm
[26] Appleby, P., Beral, V., Berrington de Gonzalez, A., Colin, D., Franceschi, S., Goodhill, A., et.al. Cervical cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data for 16,573 women with cervical cancer and 35,509 women without cervical cancer from 24 epidemiological studies, Lancet, 2007. 370: p. 1609-21., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17993361/
[27] Franceschi, S., The IARC commitment to cancer prevention: the example of papillomavirus and cervical cancer, Recent Results Cancer Res, 2005. 166: p. 277-97.
[28] IARC, Combined estrogen-progestogen contraceptives and combined estrogen-progestogen menopausal therapy, IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum, 2007. 91: p. 1-528.
[29] Moreno, V., Bosch, F. X., Munoz, N., Meijer, C. J., Shah, K. V., Walboomers, J. M., et.al. Effect of oral contraceptives on risk of cervical cancer in women with human papillomavirus infection: the IARC multicentric case-control study, Lancet, 2002. 359: p. 1085-92.
[30] Castellsague, X., Bosch, F. X., Munoz, N., Environmental co-factors in HPV carcinogenesis, Virus Res, 2002. 89: p. 191-9.
[31] Wang, S. S., Bratti, M. C., Rodriguez, A. C., Herrero, R., Burk, R. D., Porras, C., et.al. Common variants in immune and DNA repair genes and risk for human papillomavirus persistence and progression to cervical cancer, J Infect Dis, 2009. 199: p. 20-30.
[32] Wang, S. S., Gonzalez, P., Yu, K., Porras, C., Li, Q., Safaeian, M., et.al. Common genetic variants and risk for HPV persistence and progression to cervical cancer, PLoS One, 2010. 5: p. e8667.
[33] Munoz, N., Bosch, F. X., de Sanjose, S., Herrero, R., Castellsague, X., Shah, K. V., et.al. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer, N Engl J Med, 2003. 348: p. 518-27.
[34] Plummer, M., Herrero, R., Franceschi, S., Meijer, C. J., Snijders, P., Bosch, F. X., et.al. Smoking and cervical cancer: pooled analysis of the IARC multi-centric case-control study, Cancer Causes Control, 2003. 14: p. 805-14.
[35] Schiffman, M., Wentzensen, N., Wacholder, S., Kinney, W., Gage, J. C., Castle, P. E., Human papillomavirus testing in the prevention of cervical cancer, J Natl Cancer Inst, 2011. 103(5): p. 368-83., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21282563
[36] Roura, E., Travier, N., Waterboer, T., de Sanjose, S., Bosch, F. X., Pawlita, M., et.al. The Influence of Hormonal Factors on the Risk of Developing Cervical Cancer and Pre-Cancer: Results from the EPIC Cohort, PLoS One, 2016. 11(1): p. e0147029., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26808155
[37] Cortessis, V. K., Barrett, M., Brown Wade, N., Enebish, T., Perrigo, J. L., Tobin, J., et.al. Intrauterine Device Use and Cervical Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, Obstet Gynecol, 2017. 130(6): p. 1226-1236., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29112647