4. Prevention and early detection – Cervical Carcinoma
Major changes in the chapter on prevention and early detection
This chapter has been considerably shortened. Detailed information is provided in the complementary Level 3 guideline on the prevention of cervical carcinoma (AWMF register no. 015/027OL).
P. Hillemanns, B. Mangold, R. Lellé, M.C. Koch, M.W. Beckmann, M. Jentschke
Recommendations on the prevention and early detection of cervical carcinoma are presented in the Level 3 guidelines (S3) “Vaccine Prevention of HPV-Associated Neoplasia” (AWMF register no. 082/002) and “Prevention of Cervical Carcinoma” (AWMF register no. 015/027OL).
- Consensus
- Strong consensus
4.1 Primary prevention - HPV vaccination
Recommendations on primary prevention of cervical carcinoma by vaccination against the high-risk genotypes of human papillomavirus (HR-HPV), HPV 16 and 18, are given in Germany in the Level 3 guideline on “Vaccine Prevention of HPV-Associated Neoplasia” (AMWF register no. 082/002), by the Paul Ehrlich Association for Chemotherapy (HPV Management Forum Working Group), the German STI Association, the German Dermatological Association, and in the recommendations of the Standing Vaccination Committee of the Robert Koch Institute (STIKO).
Infection of the cervical epithelium with high-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV) is the main cause of the development of cervical carcinoma. More than 95% of cervical carcinomas are HPV-positive, with HPV type 16 being found in 50–60% and HPV type 18 in 10–20% of the carcinomas [38] [39]. In German studies, approximately 60% of all high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CIN 2/3) have been found to be associated with HPV types 16 and 18. The risk of infection with HPV increases with the number of sexual partners. Consistent use of condoms reduces the risk of transmission, but does not provide absolute protection against infection [40]. HPV is a common sexually transmitted infection. The risk of infection with HPV increases with the number of sexual partners. Consistent condom use reduces the risk of transmission but is not absolute protection [41]. Cofactors that influence the risk of HPV-positive women developing invasive carcinoma include prolonged use of oral contraceptives, smoking, high parity, immunosuppression, HIV infection, and other genital infections such as chlamydia or herpes [42]. HPV infection is common, but not all patients develop manifest dysplasia or carcinoma, as the rate of spontaneous recovery is high.
TThe bivalent and nonavalent HPV vaccines that are currently approved contain noninfectious virus-like particles (VLPs) without any viral DNA and are directed against HPV 16/18 and in the nonavalent vaccines against HPV 6/11/31/33/45/52/58 in addition. These VLPs can stimulate the humoral and in some cases also the cellular immune system [43]. Many studies have confirmed that the vaccines are remarkably effective for prophylaxis in young women with no exposure to HPV, women aged 25–45, and also in HPV-naïve men and in children against vaccine type–specific anogenital diseases [44]. The safety profile of these vaccines is very good — after two decades of their use. In several countries with high rates of vaccination coverage, a significant decline in genital warts (> 90%) and a reduction in the numbers of cases of intraepithelial neoplasia among young women have been recorded.
On the basis of theoretical vaccine efficacy, the nonavalent HPV vaccine introduced in 2016 will provide marked improvements of 90% against invasive cervical carcinomas, 75–85% against CIN 2/3, and 50–60% against CIN 1 [45] Studies have also confirmed very high effectiveness relative to the end points of vaccine type–specific intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix, vulva, and vagina [46]. The current vaccination rate is 44.6% according to the RKI in 2018 and 57.9% after at least one vaccination dose. There is increasing evidence from national registry analyses — from Australia, for example — that a single vaccination provides adequate immunity.
The STIKO recommends general vaccination of all girls and boys aged 9–14. Vaccination with two vaccination doses at an interval of 6 months should be completed if possible before the first sexual intercourse [47]. A third vaccination dose is required above the age of 14. Repeat vaccination should be given by age 17. Since 2018, HPV vaccination is now also recommended by the STIKO for all boys aged 9–14. The background to this is the significant reduction in the disease burden of HPV-associated tumors in both sexes that can be expected with the current vaccination rates among girls as a result of the additional vaccination of boys [48].
4.2 Secondary prevention - early detection of cervical carcinoma
Recommendations for secondary prevention of cervical carcinoma are dealt with in the Level 3 guideline on “Prevention of Cervical Cancer,” register no. 015-027OL, under the auspices of the German Association for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) [49].
Primary screening and diagnosis are regulated in the guideline published by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) on November 22, 2018 on organized cancer screening programs and the program for the early detection of cervical carcinoma.
4.2.1 Early detection of cervical carcinoma in Germany
Early detection examinations for cancer were introduced in Germany on 23 June 1971, in accordance with the guidelines of the Federal Committee of Physicians and Health Insurance Funds. Through the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA), which was established in 2004, statutory reimbursement for early detection examinations for cancer has been further developed in guidelines in accordance with Section 92, paragraph 1, clause 2, no. 3 of the German Social Security Code (SGB) and Section 25, paragraph 2 of SGB V (Cancer Early Detection Guideline [KFE-RL], March 3, 2011). Entitlement to early detection examinations is established by statute in SGB V (Sections 25 and 26). With regard to cervical carcinoma, one genital examination per year is carried out starting from the age of 20. This consists of specific questioning, inspection of the cervix and uterine orifice, speculum examination of the vaginal portion of the cervix, taking a smear from the surface of the ectocervix and cervical canal and cytological examination of it (Pap smear), and gynecological palpation of the vagina. The examination also includes discussion of findings in the case of unusual cytological results. The costs are covered by the statutory health insurance funds.
The current average rates of participation in cancer screening examinations for cervical carcinoma are not reported by the Central Institute of Statutory Health-Insurance Physicians. Reasons for this include the widely differing participation rates among younger and older age groups, as well as the separate surveying conducted in the individual federal states. According to an analysis of data from the Statutory Health Insurance Fund (AOK) for Lower Saxony, the maximum average annual participation rate is around 45% [50]. Lower participation rates were observed in patients with lower professional qualifications. The highest rate was among 25–29-year-olds (annually approx. 60%; biennially approx. 77%). The biennial participation rate among women aged 30–39 was approx. 70%, while in the 50–59-year-old age group it was approx. 55%. Overall, there were no relevant differences between the 2-year (63.4–66.5%) and 3-year rates (64.4–67.6%). More than 30% of women did not participate in screening during a 3-year period.
As part of the quality assurance agreement (Section 8), physicians practicing cytology are required to submit their annual statistics to the relevant Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (Kassenärztliche Vereinigungen, KV). The cytology committees convened by the associations evaluate the submitted data, which are then sent in anonymized form to the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung). A total of 1898 squamous cell carcinomas, 679 adenocarcinomas, 26,453 CIN 3 lesions, 637 AIS, and 1795 extracervical malignancies, mostly endometrial carcinomas, were registered in the annual statistics for 2016. In all, 97.22% of the 15,839,847 women screened had unremarkable findings. A total of 441,027 screening participants had cytological findings requiring further examination. Histological analysis was performed for 51,195 women. This figure represents 0.32% of all the women screened [11].
The accuracy rate for lesions ≥ CIN2 was over 90% for Pap IVa-p. The accuracy rate for lesions ≥ CIN3 was over 97 % for Pap V-p [11].
The annual statistics indicate the frequency of pathological findings and the accuracy of group IV-p and V-p findings for carcinomas and precursor lesions. However, important information such as the corresponding histological correlate is lacking for the Pap groups II, III and IIID1/2, making it difficult to calculate the risk or draw conclusions about which diagnostic measures are preferable [11].
4.2.2 New program for early detection of cervical carcinoma starting in 2020
Recent findings from meta-analyses of randomized and controlled studies and cohort studies using testing for high-risk genital human papillomavirus (HPV) in comparison with cytology led to discussions concerning the further development of cervical cancer screening. The aims were to improve the sensitivity of the examination and to increase the participation rate. Following intensive discussions among the various groups of interested parties, the G-BA defined the design of the future screening program at a meeting held on September 15, 2018 and set it out in the a guideline [51] [52]. The guideline is largely based on the recommendations of the Level 3 guideline on prevention of cervical carcinoma [49], [51]. Organized screening in Germany started on January 1, 2020:
-
For the first time, women are entitled to cervical cancer screening services starting from age 20: eligible women (Section 5) qualify to receive an invitation, information and explanations, cytology-based or combined primary screening with a clinical examination, reporting of findings and counseling (Section 6), and further diagnosis (Section 7).
-
Women aged 20–34 are eligible for annual cytology-based cervical cancer screening in accordance with Section 6, paragraph 3. If a negative HPV test is obtained, women aged 30–34 with Pap group II-p or II-g cytology results are eligible for repeat participation in primary screening.
-
In the future, women aged 35 and over are to be offered a combination examination consisting of an HPV test and a cytological examination every 3 years instead of the annual cytological examination.
-
Eligible women will be invited to participate when they reach the age of initial eligibility. Further invitations are to be issued in each case at the ages of 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, and 65.
-
No upper age limit has been set. However, women should be informed about the conditions in which stopping screening will only involve a low residual risk of cervical cancer.
-
During a transitional phase of at least 6 years, data will be collected as part of the monitoring process to determine whether further changes in the screening strategy are needed.
References
[38] Munoz, N., Bosch, F. X., de Sanjose, S., Herrero, R., Castellsague, X., Shah, K. V., et.al. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer, N Engl J Med, 2003. 348: p. 518-27., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12571259
[39] Walboomers, J. M., Jacobs, M. V., Manos, M. M., Bosch, F. X., Kummer, J. A., Shah, K. V., et.al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide, J Pathol, 1999. 189: p. 12-19., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10451482
[40] Klug, S. J., Hukelmann, M., Hollwitz, B., Duzenli, N., Schopp, B., Petry, K. U., et.al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus types in women screened by cytology in Germany, J Med Virol, 2007. 79: p. 616-25., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17385693
[41] Winer, R. L., Hughes, J. P., Feng, Q., O'Reilly, S., Kiviat, N. B., Holmes, K. K., et.al. Condom use and the risk of genital human papillomavirus infection in young women, N Engl J Med, 2006. 354: p. 2645-54., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16790697
[42] Castellsague, X., Bosch, F. X., Munoz, N., Environmental co-factors in HPV carcinogenesis, Virus Res, 2002. 89: p. 191-9., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12445659
[43] Frazer, I. H., Leggatt, G. R., Mattarollo, S. R., Prevention and treatment of papillomavirus-related cancers through immunization, Annu Rev Immunol, 2011. 29: p. 111-38., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21166538
[44] Bray, F., Carstensen, B., Moller, H., Zappa, M., Zakelj, M. P., Lawrence, G., et.al. Incidence trends of adenocarcinoma of the cervix in 13 European countries, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2005. 14: p. 2191-9., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16172231
[45] Hillemanns, Peter, HPV-Impfstoff der Zweiten Generation: Gegen neun Virustypen gerichtet, Dtsch Arztebl International, 2013. 110(51-52): p. 2479-80., https://www.aerzteblatt.de/int/article.asp?id=152479
[46] Joura, E. A., Giuliano, A. R., Iversen, O. E., Bouchard, C., Mao, C., Mehlsen, J., et.al. A 9-valent HPV vaccine against infection and intraepithelial neoplasia in women, N Engl J Med, 2015. 372(8): p. 711-23., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25693011
[47] Ständige Impfkommission (STIKO) am RKI, Epidemiologisches Bulletin Nr. 35/2014Robert Koch-Institut, 2014., https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Infekt/EpidBull/Archiv/2014/Ausgaben/35_14.pdf
[48] Ständige Impfkommission (STIKO) am RKI, Epidemiologisches Bulletin Nr. 26/2018Robert Koch Institut, 2018., https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Infekt/EpidBull/Archiv/2018/Ausgaben/26_18.pdf
[49] S3-LL_Prävention_des_Zervixkarzinoms_Langversion 1.1 - März 2020 AWMF-Registernummer 015/025OL, https://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Downloads/Leitlinien/Zervixkarzinom_Praevention/LL_Prävention_des_Zervixkarzinoms_Langversion_1.1.pdf
[50] Geyer, S., Jaunzeme, J., Hillemanns, P., Cervical cancer screening in Germany: group-specific participation rates in the state of Niedersachsen (Lower Saxony). A study with health insurance data, Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2014. p. 623–629., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25138124
[11] Marquardt, Katrin, Kossowski, Izabella, Hantschke-Zerbich, Heike, Michel, Frank, An der Schwelle zum organisierten Zervixkarzinomscreening, Der Gynäkologe, 2019. 52(8): p. 622-627.
[51] Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, Beschluss über eine Änderung der Beauftragung des Instituts für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen: zur Erstellung von Einladungsschreiben und Versicherteninformation zum ZervixkarzinomscreeningGemeinsamer Bundesausschuss,, 2016., https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/39-261-2713/2016-09-15_Aenderung_Beauftragung-IQWiG_Einladung_Zervixkarzinom-Screening_vom-2015-03-19.pdf
[52] Beschluss des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses über eine Änderung der Krebsfrüherkennungs-Richtlinie und eine Änderung der Richtlinie für organisierte Krebsfrüherkennungsprogramme: Programm zur Früherkennung von Zervixkarzinomen, 2018., https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/39-261-3597/2018-11-22_oKFE-RL_Zervixkarzinom.pdf