Leitlinienprogramm OnkologieActinic keratosis and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin

9. Follow-up and prevention – Actinic keratosis and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin

Version 2.0 · December 2022 · AWMF 032/022OL
Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie · Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft · Deutsche Krebshilfe · AWMF

U. Leiter, S. El Gammal, K. Fritz, A. Hauschild, S.M. John, P. Mohr, Ch. Pfannenberg

9.1 Examinations within the framework of aftercare

9.1 · Consensus-based Recommendation · modified 2022

Follow-up for patients with SCC of the skin should be offered at risk-adjusted intervals according to the following schedule:

 

 

Year 1-2

Year 3-5

Year 6-10

Primary tumor stage

Low risk

6-monthly

Yearly

-

High risk

3-monthly

6-monthly

annually

Immunocompromised patients

3-monthly

3-6 monthly

3-6 monthly according to risk profile

Advanced stages

Locally advanced/ metastatic

3-monthly (up to and including year 3)

3-6 monthly (year 4-5)

6 monthly/ annually

Consensus
Strong consensus (100%)
Change noteto medium painted
Evidence tables (1)Nachsorge

The question of the intervals at which follow-up care should be performed must be considered in a differentiated manner with regard to the individual goals of regulated follow-up care.

  1. Early detection of local recurrences or metastases
  2. The early detection of further SCC and its precursors.

Here, the conditions and results of a clinical or apparative metastasis diagnosis are most subject to temporal and stage-dependent influences. General boundary conditions can be formulated for the early detection of second tumors.

9.1.1 Examination intervals for early detection of metastasis

The question of whether targeted metastasis diagnostics can be used to improve lethality, morbidity, and quality of life of affected patients plays a significant role in the question of appropriate examination intervals. However, no data are available in SCC on the extent to which outcomes can be influenced by different follow-up regimens.

What is significant here is how much risk of recurrence a patient is judged to be under at any given time. Based on their data on recurrence frequency, McCarthy et al. in 1988 created a general model calculation and calculation basis for examination intervals to be aimed for [539]. These are based on two assumptions:

  1. The relative rate of recurrence detected by follow-up is at least 50% (compared with events detected by the patient or symptoms or incidental findings).
  2. The theoretical probability of not detecting a metastatic event through missed follow-up should not exceed 1%.

These conditions lead to breaking down follow-up examinations to intervals in which the calculated probability of metastasis is no more than 2 percent. The consideration of what the minimum probability of metastasis should be for follow-up to still be considered reasonable is not addressed. The question of when the risk of metastasis can be considered significantly high for an intensified follow-up regimen would in principle also have to be based on cost-benefit evaluations, about which, however, no publications are available.

9.1.2 Risk-adapted intervals according to stages

The need to differentiate both the follow-up intervals and the type and extent of the recommended examinations by stage arises both from the cumulative recurrence risks for the individual stages and from their temporal progression.

To avoid "overindividualization" of follow-up, most recommendations [360][445][104][540] target two risk groups, low and high metastatic risk, respectively.

Generally, the term follow-up is applied to patients with clinical tumor freedom. These are usually patients with completely surgically resected primary tumors and/or locoregional metastases. In principle, however, these could also be distant metastases that have been resected or are in complete remission due to other methods (radiation, drug therapy), although this is very rare in SCC. In the case of a recurrence of SCC as a second malignancy, follow-up care starts anew each time, so that it may be lifelong.

The aim of a classification into risk groups is a consistent and well discriminating grading on the basis of relevant prognostic parameters.

As with other solid tumors, SCC staging currently includes four clinical stages, I (early primary tumors), II (advanced primary tumors), III (locoregional metastasis), and IV (distant metastasis). The current AJCC 2010 classification [541] applies to SCC except those in the neck-head region. This classification does not map the risk of metastasis. Risk factors such as immunosuppression, which cause a significantly worse prognosis, are not mapped:

  • Tumors with poor prognosis are predominantly classified into low tumor stages
  • Stage T4 tumors rarely metastasize
  • T3 and T4 tumors according to AJCC 2010 show similar survival rates [343]
  • T2 tumors have the worst prognosis [343]

Thus, there is an overlap of stages that should be considered in the definition of the follow-up recommendation.

For SCC in the neck-head region, there is a classification according to AJCC 2017 that better reflects risk factors such as tumor thickness >6 mm and PNI. These tumors are classified as T3 and assigned to stage III.

9.1.3 Explanation of the recommendation

In order to detect recurrences and second tumors of SCC at an early stage, a risk-adapted follow-up is recommended.

The following factors are considered prognostic for metastasis or disease-specific survival in cutaneous SCC: vertical tumor thickness (>6 mm), horizontal tumor thickness (≥ 2 cm), histologic differentiation (> grade 3), desmoplasia, perineural growth, localization (lower lip, ear), and immunosuppression (iatrogenic or disease-related). 

Because approximately 80% of recurrences occur within the first 2 years after primary diagnosis, intensified follow-up is advocated for this period. Most recurrences (69%) occurred within the first year after primary diagnosis, 84% within the first 2 years, and 91% in years 1-3. Local recurrences occurred 75% within 2 years and 83% within 3 years after primary diagnosis, but not after more than 6 years [20][351]. In cervical SCC, the vast majority of parotideal metastases arise within the first 2 years after diagnosis. Close sonographic examination of parotidal and cervical lymph nodes is required in high-risk patients, especially in the first 2 years after diagnosis of skin carcinoma, for timely diagnosis of locoregional metastases [360][445] [104][112].

Therefore, patients should be followed up closely in years 1-2 after primary diagnosis. This is especially true for patients at high risk of recurrence such as patients with immunosuppression, organ transplantation, and multiple tumors.

Intensified follow-up includes three-monthly screening intervals. The individual follow-up examinations can be performed with different diagnostic methods according to the risk. As risk decreases, follow-up intervals can be extended beyond a 6-month interval to 1-year intervals.

Low-risk patients may not require long-term follow-up.

Because the independent prognostic effect of high-risk factors has not been consistently reported, follow-up should be based on individual risk assessment and tumor- and patient-related characteristics, with particular attention to patients with more than one risk factor.

In patients with locally advanced or metastatic SCC and after surgery for locoregional metastases, follow-up examinations should be performed every 3 months for the first 5 years and every 6 months thereafter [384].

In patients at high risk for other primary tumors (immunosuppression, hematologic comorbidities, genetic predisposition, prior multiple SCC), close follow-up, every 3 months for the first 5 years and every six months thereafter for life, is recommended, depending on the total number and frequency of development of new tumors [384].

Follow-up of patients with occupational skin tumors (BK5103) is based on the prognostic factors of the leading SCC.

Education and detailed instructions for self-examination are basic components of follow-up. According to available data, the reassuring aspect of a negative examination result is also of particular importance in the psychosocial support of tumor-free patients. No specific intervals of a regulated aftercare are derived from this in the literature [542]. With regard to psychosocial support, it seems plausible to offer at least four appointments in the first two years after diagnosis, even in early stages, in order to meet the support needs of patients.

9.1.4 Examination intervals for the early detection of secondary squamous cell carcinoma of the skin

It is estimated that 30-50% of subsequent SCCs occur within 1 year of diagnosis of the primary tumor [540], the risk of which is highest within the first 4 years after primary diagnosis but is still significantly increased after 15 years of follow-up (SIR 3.0; 95% CI 2.5-3.6) [540]. A cohort study from the United States of 1,426 patients showed 5- and 10-year risks of developing another SCC of 42.1 and 69.1%, respectively [543]. The development of independent second tumors are common problems, especially in high-risk patients. These include patients with field cancerization on the face, hands, and capillitium, and with chronic immunosuppression after organ transplantation [544][30].

This also speaks for a close-meshed control in the first years after primary diagnosis. The aim here is to detect and treat secondary SCC at an early stage. Secondary prevention of SCC also includes early treatment of precursor lesions such as AK.

9.1.5 Investigational methods in the follow-up of invasive squamous cell carcinoma

9.2 · Consensus-based Statement · new 2022

The following examination methods are recommended depending on risk factors of the primary tumor, immunosuppression or after locally advanced and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the skin according to the present scheme:

Stage

Physical examination

Lymph node sonography

Imaging examinations CT, MRI, PET-CT

Year

1-2

3-5

6-10

1-2

3-5

6-10

1-3

4-5

6-10

Primary tumors

Low risk

2x

1x

-

 0-2x

-

-

-

-

-

High risk

4x

2x

1x

1-4x***

0-2x***

-

0-/2x**

-

-

Immunosuppressed patients

4x

2-4x

2-4x

1-4x***

0-2x***

-

0-2x**

-

-

Locally advanced / metastasized

4x

4x

2-4x

4x

2x

-

 2x

-

-

*for R0 resected stages, Low risk: TD ≤6mm, ≤4mm for desmoplasia, G1-2 differentiation, High risk, TD > 6mm, >4mm for desmoplasia, G3-4 differentiation, perineural tumor growth, immunosuppressed and patients with secondary tumors, see question I.3.
** in case of perineural tumor growth
*** depending on risk factors

Consensus
Consent (83%)
Evidence tables (1)Nachsorge

9.1.5.1 Clinical examination

9.3 · Consensus-based Recommendation · checked 2022

Clinical examination shall be performed regularly in all patients after squamous cell carcinoma of the skin as part of follow-up and shall include inspection of the entire skin organ and inspection and palpation of the primary tumor site, in-transit area, and regional lymph nodes.

Consensus
Strong consensus
Evidence tables (1)Nachsorge

If and as long as tumor follow-up in the closer sense is required, whole-body inspection for the detection of secondary SCC, local recurrence and metastases will fulfill this task as an integral part of follow-up. This includes a focused history, inspection of the entire integument, and palpation of the primary scar, in-transit and lymphatic drainage areas, and lymph node stations. At the beginning of follow-up, this should be supplemented with guidance on self-examination and preventive measures [360][361][104].

Early detection of recurrences during follow-up benefits especially those patients in whom complete surgical removal of the filiae is possible. Local recurrences and secondary SCC are predominantly found on physical examination, but for the detection of lymph node metastases in the head and neck region, clinical examination is inferior to lymph node sonography [112].

9.1.5.2 Lymph node sonography

9.4 · Consensus-based Recommendation · modified 2022

Lymph node ultrasonography should be performed in patients at high risk of metastasis* or with unclear palpation findings and in cases of locally advanced and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.

*High risk: TD >6mm, >4mm in desmoplasia, G3-4 differentiation, perineural tumor growth, immunosuppressed and patients with secondary tumors.

Consensus
Strong consensus (100%)
Change noteLymph node ultrasonography should be performed in patients at increased risk of metastasis or if palpation is unclear.
Evidence tables (1)Nachsorge

Sonography includes sonography of the excisional scar of the primarius, the in-transit road, and the locoregional lymph node area and other stations as appropriate. Metastases of SCC occur locoregionally as satellite, in-transit, or locoregional lymph node metastases in approximately 80% of cases; locoregional filiae detected early have the option of R0 resection. Therefore, early detection of locoregional lymph node filiae is of particular importance.

For staging of parotidal and cervical lymph nodes in SCC in the neck-head region, sonography is considered the method of choice and is clearly superior to clinical examination by palpation for staging and timely diagnosis of lymph node metastases [112]. Compared with MRI, LN sonography shows similar values for sensitivity and specificity (66% and 78%, respectively) [113]. In cases of sonographic suspicion of the presence of parotidal and cervical metastases, staging should be supplemented by fine-needle cytology of the suspicious lymph nodes, CT scan of the neck and thorax, and MRI of the parotid gland.

In the case of tumors with an increased risk of metastasis (from tumor thickness >5 mm, grade 3 differentiation, in immunosuppressed patients), lymph node ultrasonography is recommended at 3- to 6-month intervals. In locally advanced tumors or locoregional metastases, LN ultrasonography is recommended at 3-month intervals on a regular basis, otherwise in case of unclear findings [360][384][112][445].

In a meta-analysis of 74 studies, LN ultrasonography, which is cost-effective compared with cross-sectional imaging, was the procedure with the highest sensitivity and specificity for detecting locoregional lymph node filiae in melanoma [545]. LN sonography is superior to palpation in this regard [546]. LN ultrasonography is also described in the diagnosis of HNSCC as the most effective procedure with the highest positive predictive value to detect locoregional lymph node metastases or shows a sensitivity of about 75% and specificity of 85% [110][114].

In a meta-analysis comparing different imaging modalities (ultrasound, CT, MRI, PET) in lymph node diagnosis in clinically N0 HNSCC, the positive predictive value for lymph node ultrasonography was 25% to 56%, the negative predictive value was 95% to 84%, and lymph node ultrasonography was equivalent to the other modalities in accuracy [113]. An increase in diagnostic specificity can be achieved by sonographically guided fine needle aspiration of suspicious lymph nodes [110]. Lymph node ultrasonography also proved to be at least equivalent in detecting occult lymph node metastases from HNSCC tumors when compared with FDG-PET/CT and software-based fusion PET/MRI (plus DWI), although published PET data often refer to studies with inhomogeneous collectives (N-/N+) with varying levels of evidence [114][547][548].

Studies on sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases from cutaneous SCC are not available.

9.1.5.3 Chest X-ray and abdominal sonography

9.5 · Consensus-based Recommendation · modified 2022

Chest X-ray examinations and abdominal ultrasonography should not be routinely performed during follow-up.

Consensus
Strong consensus (100%)
Change noteX-ray thoracic examinations should not be routinely performed in follow-up. Abdominal ultrasonography should not be routinely performed in follow-up.
Evidence tables (1)Nachsorge

Chest X-ray examinations are clearly inferior to chest CT in the detection of small pulmonary filiae [549][116]. A problem with chest X-ray examinations is the high number of false positive and false negative findings. Chest X-ray examinations detect only 28-60% of pulmonary metastases diagnosed on chest CT.

Abdominal ultrasonography can detect parenchymal distant metastases and abdominal lymph node metastases, e.g., in perianal SCC or Bowen's carcinoma in the genital area, but the diagnostic accuracy is examiner- and patient-dependent and overall lower than that of MRI, CT, and PET/CT. Limitations arise particularly in the diagnosis of deep-seated structures (e.g., retroperitoneal lymph nodes) and in obese patients. An advantage of abdominal ultrasonography is its easy practicability, wide availability, and lack of radiation exposure.

9.1.5.4 Cross-sectional imaging

9.6 · Consensus-based Recommendation · modified 2022

Cross-sectional imaging should be performed to investigate recurrences, e.g. with suspected involvement of functional structures, in cases of locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or in cases of suspected perineural tumor growth or metastatic findings.

Consensus
Strong consensus
Change noteCross-sectional imaging should be performed to clarify recurrences, e.g., with suspected involvement of functional structures or when perineural tumor growth or metastasis-supecific findings are suspected.
Evidence tables (1)Nachsorge

Studies on the regular use of cross-sectional imaging in the follow-up of cutaneous SCC do not exist, therefore its use is reserved for the clarification of metastatic findings. The type of cross-sectional imaging to be selected in the work-up of metastatic findings depends on practical and economic availability and the body region to be examined.

In addition to high diagnostic accuracy, CT offers the advantages of standardized whole-body examination (neck to pelvis), general availability, and patient and examiner independence compared with sonography. Especially in the diagnosis of small pulmonary metastases, CT examinations show the highest accuracy [550] and should be preferred for this purpose [549][116]. The disadvantage of CT is the radiation exposure, as well as the limited soft tissue contrast.

Therefore, MRI is recommended by numerous authors as the method of choice for the evaluation of perineural tumor growth in cutaneous SCC and HNSCC [551][552][553][554]. MRI is also superior to CT in the diagnosis of cerebral and hepatic metastases as well as in cases of suspicion of deep soft tissue infiltration due to the high soft tissue contrast. Another advantage is the lack of radiation exposure.

CT and MRI show comparable accuracies with regard to the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastases. A meta-analysis comparing different imaging modalities (ultrasound, CT, MRI, PET) in lymph node diagnosis in clinically N0 HNSCC showed similar results in pooled sensitivity and specificity [113].

Table 36: Sensitivity and specificity of imaging techniques

 

CT

MRI

PET

LN sonography

Sensitivity

52%

65%

66%

66%

Specificity

93%

81%

87%

78%

 

Functional imaging using FDG-PET/CT and PET/MRI can detect distant metastases of a SCC in particular with high sensitivity and specificity due to their significantly increased glucose metabolism [110][122][121]. Several studies in HNSCC have shown that PET/CT in addition to conventional work-up increases staging accuracy, improves specificity of LN diagnosis, and detects more distant metastases than CT alone [123][120]. However, micrometastases in LN in patients with clinically unremarkable lymph nodes remain a diagnostic problem for all imaging modalities.

In an analysis by Fujiwara et al. in 26 patients with high-risk SCC, PET/CT showed high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (81%) in the detection of metastases, significantly higher than conventional CT with a sensitivity of 51% and specificity of 69% [124]. In 16% of patients, a false positive finding was seen, which was predominantly due to a strong inflammatory peritumoral infiltrate with mononuclear cells. However, this showed a significantly higher SUVmax of the LN metastases compared to FDG uptake of the surrounding inflammatory infiltrate [124]. These results were confirmed by another monocentric study of 23 patients, which showed a sensitivity of 100% a positive-predictive value of 77.5% and an accuracy of also 77.5% for 18F-FDG-PET in initial staging. This examination was considered to have an important role not only in the detection of small soft tissue and lymph node metastases, but also in primary staging [125]. Another recent study by the same group of authors investigated the value of FDG-PET/CT for recurrence staging in 100 patients with cutaneous SCC. The study confirmed the superior sensitivity of the method, particularly in detecting small cutaneous/subcutaneous foci and LN, and was able to demonstrate PET/CT induced management change in 28% of patients [126].

A retrospective study examining the impact of radiological staging on disease progression in cutaneous SCC in 108 patients showed that high-risk SCC (T2b, T3) who had received multiple staging examinations (79% CT, 21% PET/CT, 19% MRI) over a median follow-up of 43 months had improved disease-free survival (p=0.028). No difference was seen in terms of distant metastasis-free or disease-specific survival [118]. A review by Duncan et al. [555] also showed a possible benefit of PET/CT in the detection of locoregional or distant metastases in non-melanoma, but due to the high costs it is mainly limited to the clarification of metastatic findings. At present, there is no guarantee that the costs of regular follow-up care will be covered by the statutory health insurance funds.

On the whole, no general recommendation for the respective examination method can be made on the basis of the current data, since no reliable studies are available for cutaneous SCC.

9.1.6 In which patients can follow-up examinations be waved?

9.7 · Consensus-based Recommendation · new 2022
All patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (e.g., even with a tumor thickness of ≤2.0 mm without the presence of other risk factors) shall be followed up because of the possible development of secondary skin tumors. The frequency of follow-up should also take into account the number of actinic keratoses as well as squamous cell carcinomas of the skin in the history.
Consensus
Strong consensus (100%)
Evidence tables (1)Nachsorge

Patients with a low risk of recurrence and a tumor thickness of ≤2 mm or a tumor diameter of ≤2 cm have no risk of local recurrence or metastasis [19][20]. Brantsch et al. showed that with a median follow-up time of 43 months (range 1–165), no metastasis occurred in patients without risk factors or a tumor thickness of ≤2.0 mm.

Local recurrence also did not occur with a tumor thickness of ≤2.0 mm unless desmoplastic growth was also present. This was an independent risk factor for local recurrence. In the presence of unfavorable prognostic factors such as vertical tumor thickness (>6 mm), horizontal tumor thickness (≥ 2 cm), histologic differentiation (> grade 3), desmoplasia, perineural growth, localization (lower lip, ear), immunosuppression (iatrogenic or disease-related), follow-up cannot be omitted.

The risk of developing further cutaneous SCC should be considered in the discussion of whether follow-up can be omitted altogether in certain groups of patients. The development of independent second tumors are common problems, especially in high-risk patients, but also those with high cumulative UV exposure.

It is estimated that 30-50% of secondary SCCs occur within 1 year of diagnosis of the primary tumor [540], the risk of which is highest within the first 4 years after primary diagnosis but is still significantly increased after 15 years of follow-up (SIR 3.0; 95% CI 2.5-3.6) [540].

In a cohort of 1,426 patients with cutaneous SCC in the United States, the 5- and 10-year risk of further SCC was estimated to be 42.1% and 69.1%, respectively [543] and the standardized incidence rate was estimated to be 15.0% in a systematic review [3].

The risk is for further epithelial tumors is significantly higher for immunosuppressed individuals in whom SCC is often multiple [544][30]. Therefore, patients with a history of SCC should also undergo follow-up to detect further secondary tumors early.

Melanoma may also occur more frequently after diagnosis of SCC. In a study by van der Lest et al., 64,054 patients with SCC of the skin were studied (national data NCR) [556]. The 21-year cumulative risk of subsequent melanoma after a first SCC or basal cell carcinoma was 1.7% and 1.3% in men and 1.3% and 1.2% in women, respectively. SIRs and AERs remained elevated for up to 21 years after the first SCC or basal cell carcinoma.

Therefore, the goal of follow-up in patients at low risk of recurrence is to detect second tumors early enough so that prognosis does not worsen compared with the initial tumor. Secondary prevention of SCC in follow-up also includes early therapy of precursor lesions such as AK. This argues for control in the first years after primary diagnosis. In the course of time, depending on the number and risk factors of the secondary tumors, it can be discussed to change the follow-up to a skin cancer screening.

9.2 Measures for the primary prevention of actinic keratosis and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin

On this topic, we refer to the detailed S3 guideline "Prevention of skin cancer" [1].

9.3 Preventive measures for special risk groups

On this topic, we refer to the detailed S3 guideline "Prevention of skin cancer" [1].

Evidence tables

Nachsorge

Study

Aims

Design

Population

Outcomes

Results

Comments

LoE

Efird et al 2002

To determine the risk of subsequent cancer following squamous cell skin cancer

Retrospective review; n=822

Individuals with primary squamous cell skin cancer (SCSC) and their comparison subjects matched for age, sex, race, residence area, and length of membership. Patients were included in the study if they had no prior history of cancer and received at least one multiphasic health checkup and questionnaire (MHC).

Subsequent cancer risk after SCSC diagnosis

Patients were followed for subsequent invasive cancer up to 24 years, with a mean follow-up time of 7.8 years. SCSC patients had a significantly greater risk [adjusted for body mass index (BMI) and education] for subsequent cancer overall (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) [risk ratio (RR) =1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) =1.2–1.6], and for basal cell skin cancer (RR =13.8, 95% CI = 8.8–21.9), digestive (RR =1.6, 95% CI =1.1–2.4), and genitourinary cancers (RR =1.5, 95% CI =1.0–2.0). An increased, but not statistically significant, adjusted risk (RR >=1.4) was also observed for lip, oral cavity, and pharynx cancer (RR =3.9, 95% CI = 0.6–25.0); non-cutaneous squamous cell cancer (RR = 1.9, 95% CI = 0.9–4.4); and respiratory and intrathoracic cancer (RR = 1.4, 95% CI = 0.8–2.6). The addition of alcohol consumption, combined occupational exposure, marital status, and smoking history to the multivariate model did not materially change any significant positive associations with SCSC.

The results suggest that patients diagnosed with SCSC may be at an increased risk of subsequent cancer at many sites, although several estimated risk estimates were within the limits of chance given no true association.

3

Griffiths et al 2002

To establish the 5-year survival and outcome for patients after conventional surgery, related to tumour characteristics and specific tumour measurements

Retrospective cohort study; n=171

Patients with primary invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, followed for a minimum of 5 years after treatment with conventional excisional surgery, in one center, between 1990 and 1995.

Patient outcomes - either alive without recurrence or metastasis at 5 years, dead of disease within 5 years or dead of other causes within 5 years.

Of these 171 patients, 157 were confirmed as having been treated for invasive squamous cell carcinoma, of whom 64 (41%) died within 5 years of treatment from causes other than squamous cell carcinoma, and were therefore defined as indeterminate. The remaining 93 patients were determinate patients; 85 lived without recurrence or metastasis for at least 5 years after treatment, and eight died of their disease. Comparing the groups who were alive or had died of disease at 5-year follow-up, the tumour diameter and tumour thickness were significantly greater in the eight patients who died (P = 0.02 and P =0.0057, respectively) but there were no  significant differences between the two groups concerning age, deep resection margin clearance, lateral epidermal resection margin clearance, lymphocyte response or degree of tumour differentiation.

There is no evidence that the prognosis is superior after either conventional surgery or Mohs' therapy, when series are compared for tumour thickness. Long-term follow-up and tumor-thickness measurements are required in all series after all treatments for meaningful comparisons to be made.

3

Harris et al 2017

To evaluate which factors are predictive of recurrence and nodal spread and survival in patients with cHNSCC treated surgically

Retrospective review; n=212

Patients with CSCCs of the head and neck treated between January 1998 and June 2014. All patients undergoing primary surgery, with or without adjuvant therapy, with curative intent for CSCC were included. Patients were excluded if they had distant metastases at presentation, were treated with palliative intent, and had <3 months of follow-up.

5-years DFS

 

DSS

 

OS

 

Associations of patient and tumor characteristics with recurrence and survival

 

Factors independently associated with the presence of nodal metastasis at presentation

A total of 212 patients met inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 70.4 years; 87.3% were men. Mean tumor diameter was 3.65 cm, with an average depth of invasion of 1.38 cm. The mean follow-up time was 35 months (median, 21.5), and over that period 67 recurrences were recorded, 49 of which were local. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimate of DFS for the cohort was 53.2%. On Cox multivariate analysis, recurrent disease, perineural invasion (PNI), and poorly differentiated histology were independent predictors of recurrence. On multinomial logistic regression, patients with primary tumors on the ear, cheek, temple, or lip, as well as those with PNI, were more likely to present with nodal metastasis.

 

Analysis of OS and DSS was limited given incomplete cause of death data and the advanced age of the patient cohort.

For advanced CSCCs of the head and neck, patients with recurrent disease, PNI, and poorly differentiated tumors are at the highest risk for local recurrence. Patients with tumors or the ear, cheek, temple, or lip, as well as those with PNI, are at increased risk of harboring nodal disease.

3

Kim et al 2018

Guidelines of care for the management of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

An expert workgroup was convened to determine the audience and scope of the guideline, and to identify important clinical questions in the biopsy, staging, treatment, and follow-up of cSCC.

An evidence-based approach was used and available evidence was obtained by using a systematic search and review of published studies from PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases from January 1960 through April 2015 for all identified clinical questions. A secondary search was subsequently undertaken to identify and review published studies from April 2015 to August 2016 to provide the most current information

 

 

After the diagnosis of a first SCC, screening for new keratinocyte cancers (BCC or cSCC) and for melanoma should be performed on at least an annual basis.

 

Patients with a history of cSCC should be counseled on skin self-examination and sun protection.

 

Topical and oral retinoids (eg, tretinoin, retinol, acitretin, and isotretinoin) should not be prescribed to reduce the incidence of keratinocyte cancers in those with a history of cSCC, unless they are SOTRs. In the situation of SOTRs, only acitretin may be beneficial.

 

Dietary supplementation of selenium and b-carotene is not recommended to reduce the incidence of future keratinocyte cancers in those with a history of cSCC.

 

There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation on the use of oral nicotinamide, DFMO, or celecoxib in the chemoprevention of cSCC.

 

1

Levine et al 2015

To compare outcomes in patients with 1 vs multiple cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (CSCCs).

Retrospective, single-center cohort; n=985

Patients with dermally invasive (non–in situ) primary CSCC diagnosed from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2009, from a tertiary center

Tumor stage (Brigham and Women’s Hospital tumor stage) and outcomes (local recurrence [LR], nodal metastases [NM], and death due to CSCC)

 

Outcomes were compared between patients with 1 vs more than 1 CSCC via multivariable competing-risk regression adjusted for other significant cofactors.

Of 985 patients with CSCC, 727 had 1 CSCC, 239 had 2 to 9 CSCCs, and 19 had 10 or more CSCCs. Most patients with 10 or more CSCCs were immunosuppressed (15 of 19 [78.9%]). The median follow-up time was 50 months (range, 2-142 months). Patients with more than 1 CSCC had a higher risk of LR (subhazard ratio for 2-9 CSCCs, 1.8; 95%CI, 1.1-4.3; and for ≥10 CSCCs, 3.8; 95%CI, 1.4 - 10.0) and NM (subhazard ratio for 2-9 CSCCs, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.4-6.5; and for ≥ 10 CSCCs, 4.2; 95%CI, 1.4-10.4) compared with patients with 1 CSCC, adjusted for Brigham and Women’s Hospital tumor stage. The 10-year cumulative incidence of LR and NM was higher in patients with 2 to 9 CSCCs and markedly higher in those with 10 or more CSCCs compared with patients who had 1 CSCC (10-year cumulative incidence for 1 CSCC: LR, 3.0%; 95%CI, 2.0%-4.5%; and NM, 2.3%; 95%CI, 1.5%-3.8%; for 2-9 CSCCs: LR, 6.7%; 95%CI, 4.2%-10.6%; and NM, 5.9%; 95%CI, 3.5%-9.6%; and for ≥10 CSCCs: LR, 36.8%; 95%CI, 19.2%-59.0%; and NM, 26.3%; 95%CI, 11.8%-48.8%).

Patients with multiple CSCCs warrant frequent follow-up because they have an elevated risk of LR and NM. In particular, patients with 10 or more CSCCs have markedly elevated risks of recurrence and metastasis.

3

Mahajan et al 2019

To analyze the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in staging patients with newly diagnosed cSCC.

Retrospective analysis; n=23

Patients with biopsy-proven cSCC who underwent 18F-FDG scan at diagnosis in one institution from 2000 to 2016.

Sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG-PET/CT

Twenty-three cSCC patients who underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT at diagnosis were evaluated. Primary sites were in head/neck (n=21), chest (n=1), and foot (n=1). All patients had 18F-FDG-positive scans with a total of 51 18F-FDG-positive lesions. All primary lesions (n=24) were 18F-FDG-positive (SUV: 2.3–22.8; mean 10.2), and additional 27 18F-FDG-positive lesions, including 21 nodes, four cutaneous, one osseous and one lung lesion, were noted in 13 patients. Mean size of 18F-FDG-positive nodes was 0.9 cm (range: 0.4–2.5 cm), predominantly clinically impalpable. Pathology was available for 40/51 lesions; 31 sites positive for malignancy. SUV (mean ± SD) was 9.2 ± 6.2 for malignant and 2.7 ± 1.2 for benign lesions. Sensitivity, positive predictive value, and accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET/CT scan were 100, 77.5, and 77.5%, respectively. Overall, staging 18F-FDG detected nine prior unknown lesions in five patients that were proven metastatic disease by histopathology or follow-up; 18F-FDG-PET/CT modified management in 5/23 (21.7%) patients

18F-FDG-PET/CT has high sensitivity in the detection of cSCC lesions, including small cutaneous and nodal disease, and has a potential role in initial staging and management.

3-4?

McLaughlin et al 2017

To determine the rate of regional lymph node involvement in a large cohort of solid organ transplant patients with cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (cHNSCC)

Retrospective chart review; n= 30 solid organ transplant patients; 383 cHNSCC ressections

All solid organ transplant recipients who underwent surgery between 2005 and 2015 for a cHNSCC at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Department of Dermatology and/or Otorhinolaryngology

 

Rate of regional lymph node involvement

 

Time from the first diagnosis to regional lymphatic disease

The average age of the patient was 63. Seven patients (5%) developed regional lymph node metastases (3 parotid, 4 cervical lymph nodes). The mean time from primary tumor resection to diagnosis of regional lymphatic disease was 6.7months. Six of these patients underwent definitive surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiation; one patient underwent definitive chemoradiation. 6 of the 7 patients died of disease progression with a mean survival of 15months. The average follow-up time was 3years (minimum 6months).

 

Solid organ transplant recipients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck develop regional lymph node metastasis at a rate of 5%. Regional lymph node metastasis in this population has a poor prognosis and requires aggressive management and surveillance.

This is the largest study to date of cSCC in solid organ transplant patients. In addition, all of these lesions were limited to the head and neck. Despite the low rate of regional lymph node involvement demonstrated in these patients, their extremely poor prognosis makes managing an N0 neck in an immunocompromised patient a difficult clinical dilemma.

3

Picard et al 2017

To search for somatic mutations of the HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and EGFR genes in patients with advanced cSCC treated with cetuximab; and to investigate the efficacy and tolerance of cetuximab according to these mutations

Multicenter retrospective study; n=31

Patients with confirmed advanced cSCC treated in two medical oncology departments in France between January 2008 and December 2014

Incidence of somatic mutations of the RAS, BRAF and EGFR genes and association with cetuximab efficacy with these mutations – Fisher test

 

Disease control rate at week 6

 

PFS

 

OS

 

Safety

31 samples of cSCC from 31 patients were analyzed. Only 2 RAS muated samples (6.5%) were identified. The first harbored an NRAS point mutation (c.35G>A) in codon 12, resulting in a p.G12D substitution. The second sample presented an HRAS point mutation (c.38G>T) in codon 13, resulting in p.G13V  substitution. No mutation of KRAS, BRAF and EGFR genes at the investigated loci was found. Two patients with NRAS and HRAS mutations showed a partial and complete response to cetuximab, respectively. The mean duration of follow-up was 19 months. At week 6, the disease control rate was 67.8%. The median OS was 13 months and the median PFS was 9 months. All patients could continue cetuximab treatment without dose reduction.

Even in elderly patients (median age 86 years; range 48-96 years), cetuximab was efficacious and well-tolerated. This suggests that cetuximab is certainly warranted in the treatment of cSCC. However, it is also important to identify tumor-specific mutations that may determine response to treatment and prognosis for the disease. We have identified here that the incidence of RAS, BRAF and EGFR mutations is low in cSCC.

 

The authors concluded that the incidence of RAS, BRAF and EGFR mutations is very low in cSCC. The search for mutations appears unnecessary before initiating a cetuximab treatment for advanced cSCC, but ultimately mutational data are needed to better define the genetic landscape of this disease.

 

Dr. Frederic Peyrade is a Merck board Member.

3

Rose et al 2017

To review the outcomes for sporadic primary cSCC in one department, to identify a sub-group of “low-risk” cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) patients suitable for discharge to primary care without extended out-patient follow-up.

Retrospective review; n=320 patients; n= 336 primary invasive cSCC

Patients with primary invasive cSCC excised within a single plastic surgery department between 2011 and 2015

To identify a sub-group of “low-risk” cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) patients suitable for discharge to primary care without extended out-patient follow-up.

Tumours were staged by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC e 7th Edition) and Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) classification systems. Tumours were then stratified into 4 risk groups: Group 1 (High-1), Group 2 (High-2), Group 3 (Intermediate) and Group 4 (Low).

 

Follow-up practices for this “low-risk” Group 4 (Low) were then scrutinized using clinical-portal “e-health” records. The financial cost of “low-risk” disease to out-patient services, both locally and nationally, was estimated using publically available specialty-specific health service cost data.

 

Group 4 (Low) patients consisted of 94 tumours (27.9%). There were no episodes of locoregional recurrence or SCC-related death in this group. At the time of analysis, 59 (67%) patients remained under active follow-up. Only 25 (26.6%) were discharged to primary care. Importantly, 18 (30.5%) Group 4 (Low) patients died of causes unrelated to their cSCC during their follow-up. 32 (34%) Group 4 (Low) patients developed further lesions. Most common were actinic keratosis (13.8%) and basal cell carcinoma (11.7%), only 6 (6.4%) developed a further cSCC.

During the follow-up period Group 4 (Low) patients were reviewed in outpatient clinics on 536 occasions (a mean of 5.8 visits per patient; range 0e14). Presuming each out-patient appointment was allocated a standard 10-min review consultation, this amounts to 89.3 h clinic time (almost 12x3-h out-patient clinics/year). Using a conservative estimate of £120 per out-patient appointment, this represents a total departmental cost of £64,320 over the study period (around £25,000/year). 3130 cSCC were registered in Scotland in 2014. If we extrapolated our data and follow-up practices nationwide, this would equate to around 873 “low-risk” cSCC patients treated, subsequently filling 5000 out-patient appointments and around 833 h of clinic time (almost 111 x 3-h out-patient clinics/year), to a cost of £597’0000 (around £240,000/year).

The primary aim of out-patient follow-up for cSCC is to screen for loco-regional recurrence. In conclusion, this data suggests it is unnecessary and costly to commit an elderly co-morbid population with adequately treated “low-risk” disease to specialist out-patient follow-up.

 

The authors recommend a realistic approach to the follow-up of immunocompetent patients with “low-risk” tumours, single out-patient visit to review histopathology, council on sun protection and self-examination and then discharge to primary care.

3

Ruiz et al 2018

To review utilization of radiologic imaging of high-stage CSCCs to evaluate whether imaging impacted management and outcomes.

Retrospective analysis; n=103

all patients with a diagnosis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma from January 1, 2000 through May 30, 2013

Disease-related outcomes (DRO: local recurrence, nodal metastasis, death from disease)

108 high-stage CSCCs in 98 patients were included. Imaging (mostly computed tomography, 79%) was utilized in 45 (46%) patients and management was altered in 16 (33%) patients who underwent imaging. Patients that received no imaging were at higher risk of developing nodal metastases (nonimaging, 30%; imaging, 13%; P = .041) and any DRO (nonimaging, 42%; imaging, 20%; P = .028) compared to the imaging group. Imaging was associated with a lower risk for DRO (subhazard ratio, 0.5; 95% CI 0.2-0.9; P = .046) adjusted for BWH T stage, sex, and location.

Radiologic imaging of high-stage CSCC may influence management and appears to positively impact outcomes. Further prospective studies are needed to establish which patients benefit from imaging.

3

Supriya et al 2014

To evaluate the impact of whole-body positron emission tomography in comparison to staging by conventional methods alone in the management of patients with head and neck cutaneous squamous cell cancer (cSCC) with confirmed regional nodal metastasis.

Retrospective case cohort study; n=31

Patients with head and neck cSCC and regional nodal metastasis  diagnosed from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2010

Impact of 18F-FDG PET–CT on patient management

The original treatment plan based on conventional cross-sectional imaging and clinical examination were compared to the final treatment plan after additional PET staging to evaluate the impact of 18F-FDG PET–CT on patient management.

Addition of 18F-FDG PET–CT did not change the management in 24/31 (77%) of patients. In four cases the 18F-FDG PET–CT failed to pick up a biopsy-proven metastatic disease. Two patients who had reduced extent of surgery have shown no features of regional failure after one year of follow-up.

Overall the management in majority of head and neck cSCC patients with regional metastasis does not change by the addition of 18F-FDG PET–CT over conventional imaging.

3

Stratigos et al 2020

To make recommendations on treatment, supportive care, education and follow-up of patients with invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC)

Recommendations were based on evidence-based literature review, guidelines and expert consensus. Treatment recommendations are presented for common primary cSCC (low risk, high risk), locally advanced cSCC, regional metastatic cSCC (operable or inoperable) and distant metastatic cSCC.

EDF–EADO–EORTC guideline

Follow-up

The frequency of follow-up visits and investigations for subsequent new cSCC depend on underlying risk characteristics.

 

1

Wassberg et al 1999

To report second primary cancers in patients with skin squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)

A population-based study; n=25947

Patients diagnosed with SCC in Sweden between 1958 and 1992.

Second primary cancers incidence

In total, 5,706 patients developed a second primary cancer at any site, compared with an expected number of 2,651 [standardized incidence ratio (SIR) = 2.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.10–2.21]. Men below 60 years of age at diagnosis of SCC had higher SIR (2.5; CI = 2.2–2.8) with the highest risk during the first year of follow-up (SIR = 9.2; CI = 6.9–12.2). If the second primary SCC was excluded, the SIR was reduced to 1.30 (CI = 1.25–1.34); the relationships by sex, age and time since diagnosis remained similar. For skin cancer, the SIR for second SCC was markedly elevated (SIR = 15.6) and the risk of malignant melanoma was elevated 3-fold. Significantly increased risks were found for most second cancers in squamous cell epithelium: lip (SIR = 5.2), respiratory organs (SIR = 1.7), esophagus (SIR = 1.5), cervix uteri (SIR = 2.2), and vulva including vagina (SIR = 2.3). There was a generally increased risk of almost 2-fold for second cancer in hematopoietic or lymphoproliferative tissues. Slightly increased rates (SIR = 1.0–1.5) were seen for second tumors in digestive tissues. Finally, a high SIR (SIR = 5.5) was observed for second primary cancer in salivary glands.

Patients with SCC are at increased risk To develop new primary cancer, especially in skin, squamous cell epithelial and tobacco-related tissues. Common risk factors among the tumor types might explain our findings, however, an intrinsic susceptibility among SCC patients to develop cancer is also possible.

3

Yoong et al 2009

To establish appropriate follow-up times and to determine the long-term risk of subsequent non-melanoma skin

cancers and melanoma.

Retrospective study; n=40

Patients who had a primary invasive cutaneous SCC excised during 1996 were retrospectively identified from the databases of a dermatologist in private practice in south-east Queensland.

Lymph node status

 

Patient’s immunocompetency

 

Presence of local recurrence, subsequent SCC, BCC and melanomas

The median follow-up time was 7.5 years. In the 10 years, there was one local recurrence of a well-differentiated SCC, which was detected at the 6 months follow up and following re-excision there was no further recurrence at the site and no metastases detected. In the entire audited group, 65% had a subsequent SCC detected. Half the patients developed a second SCC within 5 years of the index cutaneous invasive SCC, and 10% had a second SCC detected after only 5 years of follow-up. In the subgroup of patients followed up 5 years and more, 82.1% had a subsequent invasive SCC, 32.1% had invasive SCC detected within 12 months of the incident invasive SCC (this particular group had further invasive SCC detected in the audit period), 75% had invasive SCC detected in the 5–10 year follow up, and 14.3% had SCC detected only in the 5–10 year follow-up period. Of the entire audited group, 72.5% had a BCC within 5 years, and 82.5% at 10 years. The total number of BCC detected far exceeded that of invasive SCC, and 52.5% had BCC detected within 12 months of incident invasive SCC. One in eight patients had a subsequent melanoma detected.

These data which extended to 10 years, showed a significant rise in detection of further SCC as well as BCC in the period beyond 5 years. Of concern is the 10% who had their second SCC detected only in the 5–10 year follow-up period. The authors believe that these figures from our study would justify at least a 10-year follow up and we would strongly advise lifetime review.

3

 

References

[539] McCarthy, W. H., Shaw, H. M., Thompson, J. F., Milton, G. W., Time and frequency of recurrence of cutaneous stage I malignant melanoma with guidelines for follow-up study, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics, 1988. 166(6): p. 497-502., http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/3375961

[360] Bonerandi, J. J., Beauvillain, C., Caquant, L., Chassagne, J. F., Chaussade, V., Clavere, P., et.al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and precursor lesions, J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2011. 25 Suppl 5: p. 1-51., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22070399

[445] Newlands, C., Currie, R., Memon, A., Whitaker, S., Woolford, T., Non-melanoma skin cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines, The Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 2016. 130(Suppl 2): p. S125-S132., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4873942/

[104] Stratigos, A., Garbe, C., Lebbe, C., Malvehy, J., del Marmol, V., Pehamberger, H., et.al. Diagnosis and treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline, Eur J Cancer, 2015. 51(14): p. 1989-2007., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26219687

[540] Wassberg, C., Thorn, M., Yuen, J., Ringborg, U., Hakulinen, T., Second primary cancers in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: a population-based study in Sweden, Int J Cancer, 1999. 80(4): p. 511-5., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9935149

[541] Balch, C. M., Gershenwald, J. E., Soong, S. J., Thompson, J. F., Atkins, M. B., Byrd, D. R., et.al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification, J Clin Oncol, 2009. 27(36): p. 6199-206., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19917835

[343] Karia, P. S., Jambusaria-Pahlajani, A., Harrington, D. P., Murphy, G. F., Qureshi, A. A., Schmults, C. D., Evaluation of American Joint Committee on Cancer, International Union Against Cancer, and Brigham and Women's Hospital tumor staging for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, J Clin Oncol, 2014. 32(4): p. 327-34., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24366933

[20] Brantsch, K. D., Meisner, C., Schonfisch, B., Trilling, B., Wehner-Caroli, J., Rocken, M., et.al. Analysis of risk factors determining prognosis of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma: a prospective study, Lancet Oncol, 2008. 9(8): p. 713-20., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18617440/

[351] Rowe, D. E., Carroll, R. J., Day, C. L., Jr., Prognostic factors for local recurrence, metastasis, and survival rates in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, ear, and lip. Implications for treatment modality selection, J Am Acad Dermatol, 1992. 26(6): p. 976-90., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1607418

[112] Teymoortash, A., Schultz, E.S., Werner , J.A., Klinische Bedeutung parotidealer Metastasen von Plattenepithelkarzinomen der Kopfhaut, Der Hautarzt, 2007. 58(4): p. 323-327., https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-006-1275-8, https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs00105-006-1275-8.pdf

[384] Stratigos, AJ, Garbe, C, Dessinioti, C, Lebbe, C, Bataille, V, Bastholt, L, et.al. European interdisciplinary guideline on invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: Part 2. Treatment., Eur J Cancer, 2020. 128 (): p. 83-102., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32113942/

[542] Dancey, A., Rayatt, S., Courthold, J., Roberts, J., Views of UK melanoma patients on routine follow-up care, Br J Plast Surg, 2005. 58(2): p. 245-50., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15710122

[543] Wehner, MR, Linos, E, Parvataneni, R, Stuart, SE, Boscardin, WJ, Chren, MM, Timing of subsequent new tumors in patients who present with basal cell carcinoma or cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma., JAMA Dermatol, 2015. 151 (4)(4): p. 382-8., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25588079/

[544] Madeleine, MM, Patel, NS, Plasmeijer, EI, Engels, EA, Bouwes Bavinck, JN, Toland, AE, et.al. Epidemiology of keratinocyte carcinomas after organ transplantation., Br J Dermatol, 2017. 177 (5)(5): p. 1208-1216., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28994104/

[30] Harwood, CA, Mesher, D, McGregor, JM, Mitchell, L, Leedham-Green, M, Raftery, M, et.al. A surveillance model for skin cancer in organ transplant recipients: a 22-year prospective study in an ethnically diverse population., Am J Transplant, 2013. 13 (1)(1): p. 119-29., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23072567/

[361] SIGN, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Management of primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2014. (SIGN publication no. 140). [June 2014], http://www.sign.ac.uk Last access November 2017, 2014., https://www.sign.ac.uk/sign-140-management-of-primary-cutaneous-squamous-cell-carcinoma.html

[113] Liao, L. J., Lo, W. C., Hsu, W. L., Wang, C. T., Lai, M. S., Detection of cervical lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancer patients with clinically N0 neck-a meta-analysis comparing different imaging modalities, BMC Cancer, 2012. 12: p. 236., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22691269

[545] Xing, Y., Bronstein, Y., Ross, M. I., Askew, R. L., Lee, J. E., Gershenwald, J. E., et.al. Contemporary diagnostic imaging modalities for the staging and surveillance of melanoma patients: a meta-analysis, J Natl Cancer Inst, 2011. 103(2): p. 129-42., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022618/pdf/djq455.pdf

[546] Bafounta, M. L., Beauchet, A., Chagnon, S., Saiag, P., Ultrasonography or palpation for detection of melanoma nodal invasion: a meta-analysis, Lancet Oncol, 2004. 5(11): p. 673-80., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15522655

[110] de Bree, R., Takes, R. P., Castelijns, J. A., Medina, J. E., Stoeckli, S. J., Mancuso, A. A., et.al. Advances in diagnostic modalities to detect occult lymph node metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, Head Neck, 2015. 37(12): p. 1829-39., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24954811

[114] Heusch, P., Sproll, C., Buchbender, C., Rieser, E., Terjung, J., Antke, C., et.al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound, (1)(8)F-FDG-PET/CT, and fused (1)(8)F-FDG-PET-MR images with DWI for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases of HNSCC, Clin Oral Investig, 2014. 18(3): p. 969-78., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23892450

[547] Sumi, Misa, Ohki, Masafumi, Nakamura, Takashi, Comparison of Sonography and CT for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Cervical Lymph Nodes in Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck, American Journal of Roentgenology, 2001. 176(4): p. 1019-1024., https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.176.4.1761019

[548] Richards, P. S., Peacock, T. E., The role of ultrasound in the detection of cervical lymph node metastases in clinically N0 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, Cancer Imaging, 2007. 7(1): p. 167-178., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2151323/

[549] Davis, S. D., CT evaluation for pulmonary metastases in patients with extrathoracic malignancy, Radiology, 1991. 180(1): p. 1-12., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2052672

[116] Fischbach, F., Knollmann, F., Griesshaber, V., Freund, T., Akkol, E., Felix, R., Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness, Eur Radiol, 2003. 13(10): p. 2378-83., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12743736

[550] Hausmann, Daniel, Jochum, Susanne, Utikal, Jochen, Hoffmann, Richard Christian, Zechmann, Christian, Neff, Kurt Wolfgang, et.al. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI and whole-body CT in stage III/IV malignant melanoma, JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft, 2011. 9(3): p. 212-221., http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1610-0387.2011.07614.x

[551] Galloway, Thomas J., Morris, Christopher G., Mancuso, Anthony A., Amdur, Robert J., Mendenhall, William M., Impact of radiographic findings on prognosis for skin carcinoma with clinical perineural invasion, Cancer, 2005. 103(6): p. 1254-1257., http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20913

[552] Mendenhall, WM, Ferlito, A, Takes, RP, Bradford, CR, Corry, J, Fagan, JJ, et.al. Cutaneous head and neck basal and squamous cell carcinomas with perineural invasion., Oral Oncol, 2012. 48 (10)(10): p. 918-922., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22425152/

[553] Hao, Dr. Sheng-Po, Ng, Dr. Shu-Hang, Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus Clinical Palpation in Evaluating Cervical Metastasis from Head and Neck Cancer, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2000. 123(3): p. 324-327., http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1067/mhn.2000.105252

[554] Williams, Lorna Sohn, Mancuso, Anthony A., Mendenhall, William M., Perineural spread of cutaneous squamous and basal cell carcinoma: CT and MR detection and its impact on patient management and prognosis, International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics 49(4): p. 1061-1069., http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(00)01407-3

[122] Senft, A., Hoekstra, O. S., Witte, B. I., Leemans, C. R., de Bree, R., Screening for distant metastases in head and neck cancer patients using FDG-PET and chest CT: validation of an algorithm, Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2016. 273: p. 2643-50., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26350882

[121] Schlittenbauer, T., Zeilinger, M., Nkenke, E., Kreissel, S., Wurm, M. C., Lell, M., et.al. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography versus positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: A pilot study, J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2015. 43(10): p. 2129-35., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26498514

[123] Lonneux, M., Hamoir, M., Reychler, H., Maingon, P., Duvillard, C., Calais, G., et.al. Positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose improves staging and patient management in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter prospective study, J Clin Oncol, 2010. 28(7): p. 1190-5., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20124179

[120] Rohde, M., Dyrvig, A. K., Johansen, J., Sorensen, J. A., Gerke, O., Nielsen, A. L., et.al. 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in diagnosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Eur J Cancer, 2014. 50(13): p. 2271-9., https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25011659

[124] Fujiwara, Masao, Suzuki, Takahiro, Takiguchi, Tetsuya, Fukamizu, Hidekazu, Tokura, Yoshiki, Evaluation of positron emission tomography imaging to detect lymph node metastases in patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, The Journal of Dermatology, 2016. 43(11): p. 1314-1320., http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13403

[125] Mahajan, S, Barker, CA, Singh, B, Pandit-Taskar, N, Clinical value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in staging cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma., Nucl Med Commun, 2019. 40 (7)(7): p. 744-751., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31095044/

[126] Mahajan, S, Barker, CA, Mauguen, A, Singh, B, Pandit-Taskar, N, Restaging [18F] fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan in recurrent cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Diagnostic performance and prognostic significance, J Am Acad Dermatol, 2020. 82 (4)(4): p. 878-886., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31562942/

[118] Ruiz, E. S., Karia, P. S., Morgan, F. C., Schmults, C. D., The positive impact of radiologic imaging on high-stage cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma management, J Am Acad Dermatol, 2017. 76(2): p. 217-225., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27707594/

[555] Duncan, James Robert, Carr, David, Kaffenberger, Benjamin Harris, The utility of positron emission tomography with and without computed tomography in patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2016. 75(1): p. 186-196., http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2016.01.045

[19] Karia, P. S., Han, J., Schmults, C. D., Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: estimated incidence of disease, nodal metastasis, and deaths from disease in the United States, 2012, J.Am.Acad.Dermatol., 2013. 68(6): p. 957-966., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23375456/

[3] Flohil, S. C., van der Leest, R. J., Dowlatshahi, E. A., Hofman, A., de Vries, E., Nijsten, T., Prevalence of actinic keratosis and its risk factors in the general population: the Rotterdam Study, J Invest Dermatol, 2013. 133(8): p. 1971-8., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23510990/

[556] van der Leest, RJT, Hollestein, LM, Liu, L, Nijsten, T, de Vries, E, Risks of different skin tumour combinations after a first melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma in Dutch population-based cohorts: 1989-2009., J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2018. 32 (3)(3): p. 382-389., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28898461/

[1] Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF), S3-Leitlinie Prävention von Hautkrebs, Langversion 2.1, 2021. AWMF Registernummer: 032/052OL: