Lefevre_2011
Supportive Therapie · Version 2.1
|
Referenz (Autor, Jahr, Journal) |
Studientyp Mono- vs. Multizentrisch, Verblindung, Randomisierung, Arme, Fallzahl n, Land, Zeitraum
|
Patienten-merkmale Indikation, Alter, Geschlecht (m/w) |
Intervention Fallzahl n, Beschreibung der präventiven bzw. therapeutischen Maßnahme |
Kontrolle Fallzahl n, Beschreibung der präventiven Maßnahme bzw. therapeutischen Maßnahme |
Zielgrößen Primärer Endpunkt Sekundäre(r) Endpunkt(e) |
Primärer Endpunkt Angaben für Intervention vs. Kontrolle Sekundäre(r) Endpunkt(e) Angaben für Intervention vs. Kontrolle |
Finanzierung |
Evidenzstufe Bei Abwertung: Angabe von Gründen Bewertung des Autors |
|
Lefevre
2011
British Journal of Surgery |
Retrospective study
n = 107
France
01/1980 – 04/2009
|
chronic radiation enteritis (CRE)
women: 94 (87.9 %)
radiotherapy (RT) for gynaecological or digestive carcinoma: 89 pts (83.2 %)
postoperative RT: 98 pts (91.6 %)
median radiation dose: 50 (40–115) Gy.
first symptom of CRE: median of 11 (1–347) months after radiotherapy.
|
surgery for CRE - extensive small bowel resection
|
- |
outcome after surgery for CRE
Postoperative morbidity and mortality, reoperation for recurrent enteritis and risk factors for reoperation |
Main indication for surgery: symptomatic stricture (82 pts; 76.6 %).
Ileocaecal resections: 49 (45.8 %)
Overall morbidity: 74.8 % (80 pts) surgical morbidity rates: 28.0 % (30 pts)
reoperation for complications: 14 pts (13.1 %)
Reoperation rates for CRE 1 years of follow-up: 37 % 3 years of follow-up: 54 %
Risk factors for reoperation for recurrent enteritis emergency surgery (odds ratio (OR) 2.72, 95 % KI: 1.57 to 4.86), anastomotic leakage (OR 2.53, 1.54 to 4.42) and male sex (OR 3.57, 1.82 to 7.29).
protective factor for reoperation ileocaecal resection during the first surgical procedure (OR 4.48, 2.52 to 8.31) |
- |
4
"Ileocaecal resection was the only factor that protected against reoperation for recurrent CRE, demonstrating the importance of resecting all damaged tissue in these patients. These results suggest that there is little place for intestinal bypass surgery or adhesiolysis." |