Huang_2020

Supportive Therapie · Version 2.1

Referenz

(Autor, Jahr, Journal)

Studientyp

Mono- vs. Multizentrisch, Verblindung, Randomisierung, Arme, Fallzahl n, Land, Zeitraum

 

Patienten-merkmale

Indikation, Alter, Geschlecht (m/w)

Intervention

Fallzahl n, Beschreibung der präventiven bzw. therapeutischen Maßnahme

Kontrolle

Fallzahl n, Beschreibung der präventiven Maßnahme bzw. therapeutischen Maßnahme

Zielgrößen

Primärer Endpunkt

Sekundäre(r) Endpunkt(e)

Primärer Endpunkt

Angaben für Intervention vs. Kontrolle

Sekundäre(r) Endpunkt(e)

Angaben für Intervention vs. Kontrolle

Finanzierung

Evidenzstufe

Bei Abwertung: Angabe von Gründen

Bewertung des Autors

Huang

 

2020

 

BMC Surg

retrospective

 

Single centre

 

N = 811

 

China

 

11/2011 – 02/2019

Radiation-induced enteritis (RE) after pelvic malignancy radiation

 

N = 284 (35%) patients with rectal ulcer

 

N = 61 eligible for this study

 

mean age: 56.5±10.4 year

 

median interval between radiotherapy and colostomy:  11.8 months (interquartile ratio 8.7–16.1).

 

primary malignancies:

cervical cancer (n=56), prostatic cancer (n=2), endometrial cancer (n=2) and rectal cancer (n=1)

 

diverting colostomy on rectal ulcer of CRP patients

 

Pre-colostomy vs. Post-colostomy

 

Effective (n=30) vs. Ineffective (n=31)

effect of colostomy on ulcerative CRP

 

influence factors with effectiveness of colostomy.

overall effective rate of colostomy on ulcerative CRP: 49.2% (30/61)

 

 

CRP patients with ulcers cured after colostomy: 9 (31.1%)

 

pts restored intestinal continuity: 12 (19.67%)

 

remarkably alleviated

pts with rectal bleeding: 100% (55/55)

pts with anal pain: 91.4% (32/35)

 

multivariable analysis  - independent influence factors for the effectiveness of colostomy on the rectal ulcer of CRP patients

duration of stoma [OR1.211, 95% CI (1.060–1.382), P=0.005]

albumin (ALB) level post-colostomy [OR1.437, 95% CI (1.102–1.875), P=0.007]

This study was supported by Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program (Grant Number: 2019021), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 81573078). The above funders had no further role in the study design; collection, analysis and interpretation of data; writing of the manuscript; or the decision to submit this manuscript for publication.

4

retrospective design and small sample size
single centre

 

"Colostomy was an efective and safe procedure for treating rectal ulcer of CRP patients, and also a potential strategy for preventing and treating fstula. Duration of stoma for 12–24 months and higher ALB level could significantly improve the effectiveness of colostomy on ulcerative CRP patients."