Tremelimumab + Durvalumab plus Chemotherapie NSCLC Stadium IV Erstlinie, Poseidon
Lungenkarzinom · Version 5.1
| Tremelimumab (nicht-kleinzelliges Lungenkarzinom, EGFR/ALK-negativ, Erstlinie, Kombination mit Durvalumab und platinbasierter Chemotherapie) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wirkstoff | Tremelimumab | Handelsname | Tremelimumab AstraZeneca |
| Pharmazeutischer Unternehmer | AstraZeneca GmbH | Beschlussdatum | 01.09.2023 |
| Anwendungsgebiet | Nicht-kleinzelliges Lungenkarzinom | ||
| Population/ZVT | Titel | Mortalität | Morbidiät | QoL | Sicherheit | Zusatznutzen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Tremelimumab + Durvalumab bei erwachsenen Patientinnen und Patienten mit metastasiertem NSCLC mit einer PD-L1-Expression ≥ 50 % | ↔
geringerer Nutzen / Zusatznutzen nicht |
Ø
keine geeigneten Daten |
Ø
keine geeigneten Daten |
Ø
keine geeigneten Daten |
ist nicht belegt |
| ZVT | Platinbasierte Chemotherapie | |||||
| B | Tremelimumab + Durvalumab bei erwachsenen Patientinnen und Patienten mit metastasiertem NSCLC mit einer PD-L1-Expression < 50 % | Ø
keine geeigneten Daten |
Ø
keine geeigneten Daten |
Ø
keine geeigneten Daten |
Ø
keine geeigneten Daten |
ist nicht belegt |
| ZVT | platinbasierte Chemotherapie | |||||
| ↑↑/↓↓: positiver/negativer statistisch signifkanter Effekt, hohe Aussagesicherheit; ↑/↓: positiver/negativer statistisch signifkanter Effekt, niedrige oder unklare Aussagesicherheit; ↔: kein signifikanter/relevanter Unterschied; ↓: n.b.: nicht bewertbar; Ø: keine Daten | ||||||
| A Phase III, Randomized, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Comparative Global Study to Determine the Efficacy of Durvalumab or Durvalumab and Tremelimumab in Combination With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for First-Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Non Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) (POSEIDON) (NCT03164616) | |||||
| Short Name | Design | Population | Intervention | Comparator | Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POSEIDON D419MC00004, 2017-000920-81 |
Randomized, Parallel Assignment, Phase 3 Open Label study | Treatment-naive with Stage 4 and ECOG 0-1 Non Small Cell Lung Cancer NSCLC | 1. Tremelimumba + Durvalumab + Chemotherapy (N=338)1 2. Durvalumab + Chemotherapy (N=338)2 |
Chemotherapy (N=337)3 |
|
| Levels of Evidence | |||||
| GRADE | ⊕⊕⊕⊖a | We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. | |||
| 1: durvalumab + tremelimumab combination therapy + SoC chemotherapy; 2: durvalumab monotherapy + SoC chemotherapy; 3: SoC chemotherapy alone | |||||
| a: Open Label Study | |||||
| Outcome | Tremelimumba + Durvalumab + Chemotherapy N=338 | Chemotherapy N=337 | Effect Estimate | GRADE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Durvalumab With Tremelimumab in Combination With Chemotherapy: Johnson, ML 2023. Durvalumab With or Without Tremelimumab in Combination With Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase III POSEIDON Study.. ; 41 (6); 1213-1227* | |||||||
| Dichotomous Outcomes | |||||||
| OS - Time To Event | N=338 | 14.0 [11.7; 16.1] | N=337 | 11.7 [10.5; 13.1] | HR 0.77 [0.65; 0.92]; p=0.0030 | ⊕⊕⊕⊖ | |
| AJCC disease stage | |||||||
| IV A | N=171 | N=166 | HR 0.72 [0.56; 0.91] | ||||
| IV B | N=165 | N=170 | HR 0.84 [0.66; 1.06] | ||||
| ECOG | |||||||
| 0 | N=110 | N=119 | HR 0.8 [0.59; 1.09] | ||||
| 1 | N=228 | N=218 | HR 0.72 [0.59; 0.89] | ||||
| Histology | |||||||
| Nonsquamous | N=214 | 17.2 [14.9; 21.8] | N=214 | 13.1 [10.6; 15.1] | HR 0.7 [0.56; 0.87] | ||
| Squamous | N=124 | 10.4 [8.4; 12.7] | N=122 | 10.5 [8; 11.7] | HR 0.88 [0.68; 1.16] | ||
| Planned chemotherapy | |||||||
| Gemcitabine | N=111 | N=111 | HR 0.9 [0.68; 1.19] | ||||
| Nab-paclitaxel | N=23 | N=19 | HR 0.55 [0.27; 1.11] | ||||
| Pemetrexed | N=204 | [; ] | N=207 | HR 0.72 [0.57; 0.9] | |||
| Race | |||||||
| Asian | N=99 | N=128 | HR 0.97 [0.71; 1.3] | ||||
| Non-Asian | N=239 | N=209 | HR 0.65 [0.53; 0.8] | ||||
| Sex | |||||||
| Female | N=69 | [; ] | N=89 | HR 0.96 [0.66; 1.38] | |||
| Male | N=269 | [; ] | N=248 | HR 0.7 [0.58; 0.85] | |||
| Smoking history | |||||||
| Current | N=84 | N=66 | HR 0.54 [0.37; 0.79] | ||||
| Former | N=195 | N=191 | HR 0.75 [0.6; 0.94] | ||||
| Never | N=59 | [; ] | N=79 | HR 1.15 [0.79; 1.67] | |||
| PFS - Time To Event | N=338 | 6.2 [5; 6.5] | N=337 | 4.8 [4.6; 5.8] | HR 0.72 [0.6; 0.86]; p=0.0003 | ⊕⊕⊖⊖a | |
| Histology | |||||||
| Nonquamous | N=209 | 6.8 [6.1; 8.5] | N=214 | 5.5 [4.8; 6.4] | HR 0.66 [0.52; 0.84] | ||
| Squamous | N=128 | 4.6 [3.9; 5.1] | N=122 | 4.6 [4.2; 4.8] | HR 0.77 [0.58; 1.01] | ||
| DOR - Time To Event | N=335 | 9.5 [7.2; ] | N=332 | 5.1 [4.4; 6] | ⊕⊖⊖⊖b | ||
| ORR - TuDD | N=335 | 130 (38.81%) | N=332 | 81 (24.4%) | RR 1.59 [1.261; 2.006]; p=0.0001 | ⊕⊕⊕⊖ | |
| TAE (Any) | N=330 | 306 (92.73%) | N=333 | 298 (89.49%) | RR 1.04 [0.988; 1.087]; p=0.1435 | ⊕⊕⊕⊖ | |
| TAE (CTCAE ≥3) | N=330 | 171 (51.82%) | N=333 | 148 (44.44%) | RR 1.17 [0.995; 1.367]; p=0.0583 | ⊕⊕⊕⊖ | |
| TAE-Disc (Any) | N=330 | 51 (15.45%) | N=333 | 33 (9.91%) | RR 1.56 [1.034; 2.351]; p=0.0339 | ⊕⊕⊕⊖ | |
| TAE-Disc (CTCAE ≥3) | N=330 | 31 (9.39%) | N=333 | 14 (4.2%) | RR 2.23 [1.211; 4.123]; p=0.0101 | ⊕⊕⊕⊖ | |
| TirAE-D (Any) | N=330 | 11 (3.33%) | N=333 | 8 (2.4%) | RR 1.39 [0.565; 3.406]; p=0.4747 | ⊕⊕⊕⊖ | |
| TSAE (Any) | N=330 | 91 (27.58%) | N=333 | 59 (17.72%) | RR 1.56 [1.164; 2.08]; p=0.0028 | ⊕⊕⊕⊖ | |
| TSAE (CTCAE ≥3) | N=330 | 70 (21.21%) | N=333 | 44 (13.21%) | RR 1.61 [1.137; 2.267]; p=0.0072 | ⊕⊕⊕⊖ | |
| Outcome | Durvalumab + Chemotherapy N=338 | Chemotherapy N=337 | Effect Estimate | GRADE | |||
| Durvalumab Without Tremelimumab in Combination With Chemotherapy: Johnson, ML 2023. Durvalumab With or Without Tremelimumab in Combination With Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase III POSEIDON Study.. ; 41 (6); 1213-1227** | |||||||
| Dichotomous Outcomes | |||||||
| OS - Time To Event | N=338 | 13.3 [11.4; 14.7] | N=337 | 11.7 [10.5; 13.1] | HR 0.86 [0.72; 1.02]; p=0.0758 | ⊕⊕⊕⊖ | |
| AJCC disease stage | |||||||
| IV A | N=170 | N=166 | HR 0.71 [0.55; 0.91] | ||||
| IV B | N=167 | N=170 | HR 1 [0.79; 1.26] | ||||
| Race | |||||||
| Asian | N=123 | N=128 | HR 0.92 [0.69; 1.22] | ||||
| Non-Asian | N=215 | N=209 | HR 0.78 [0.63; 0.96] | ||||
| Sex | |||||||
| Female | N=85 | N=89 | HR 0.91 [0.64; 1.3] | ||||
| Male | N=253 | N=248 | HR 0.81 [0.67; 0.98] | ||||
| Tumor PD-L1 expression | |||||||
| TC <50% | N=243 | N=240 | HR 0.94 [0.77; 1.14] | ||||
| TC >=1% | N=224 | [; ] | N=207 | HR 0.79 [0.64; 0.98] | |||
| TC >=50% | N=94 | N=97 | HR 0.63 [0.45; 0.88] | ||||
| TC<1% | N=113 | [; ] | N=130 | HR 0.99 [0.76; 1.3] | |||
| PFS - Time To Event | N=338 | 5.5 [4.7; 6.5] | N=337 | 4.8 [4.6; 5.8] | HR 0.74 [0.62; 0.89]; p=0.0009 | ⊕⊕⊖⊖a | |
| Histology | |||||||
| Nonsquamous | N=209 | 6.4 [4.7; 7.4] | N=214 | 5.5 [4.8; 6.4] | HR 0.77 [0.61; 0.96] | ||
| Squamous | N=128 | 4.7 [4.6; 6.3] | N=122 | 4.6 [4.2; 4.8] | HR 0.68 [0.52; 0.9] | ||
| DOR - Time To Event | N=330 | 7.0 [5.7; 9.9] | N=332 | 5.1 [4.4; 6] | ⊕⊖⊖⊖b | ||
| ORR - TuDD | N=330 | 137 (41.52%) | N=332 | 81 (24.4%) | RR 1.7 [1.354; 2.139]; p=0.0000 | ⊕⊕⊕⊖ | |
| TAE (Any) | N=334 | 296 (88.62%) | N=333 | 298 (89.49%) | RR 0.99 [0.939; 1.044]; p=0.7200 | ⊕⊕⊕⊖ | |
| TAE (CTCAE ≥3) | N=334 | 149 (44.61%) | N=333 | 148 (44.44%) | RR 1 [0.847; 1.189]; p=0.9655 | ⊕⊕⊕⊖ | |
| TAE-D (Any) | N=334 | 7 (2.1%) | N=333 | 8 (2.4%) | RR 0.87 [0.32; 2.378]; p=0.7896 | ⊕⊕⊕⊖ | |
| TAE-Disc (Any) | N=334 | 47 (14.07%) | N=333 | 33 (9.91%) | RR 1.42 [0.934; 2.158]; p=0.1005 | ⊕⊕⊕⊖ | |
| TAE-Disc (CTCAE ≥3) | N=334 | 24 (7.19%) | N=333 | 14 (4.2%) | RR 1.71 [0.9; 3.246]; p=0.1015 | ⊕⊕⊕⊖ | |
| TSAE (Any) | N=334 | 48 (14.37%) | N=333 | 59 (17.72%) | RR 0.81 [0.572; 1.15]; p=0.2403 | ⊕⊕⊕⊖ | |
| TSAE (CTCAE ≥3) | N=334 | 48 (14.37%) | N=333 | 44 (13.21%) | RR 1.09 [0.744; 1.59]; p=0.6647 | ⊕⊕⊕⊖ | |
| Outcome | Tremelimumba + Durvalumab + Chemotherapy N=338 | Chemotherapy N=337 | Effect Estimate | GRADE | |||
| Tremelimumab + Durvalumab + platinbasierte Chemotherapie vs. Pembrolizumab - Nutzenbewertung gemäß § 35a SGB V: IQWiG 2023. Tremelimumab und Durvalumab - Nutzenbewertung gemäß § 35a SGB V. *** | |||||||
| Dichotomous Outcomes | |||||||
| OS - Time To Event1 | N=554 | 0.65 [0.47; 0.89] | N=548 | 0.67 [0.56; 0.8] | HR 0.97 [0.67; 1.41]; p=0.873 | ⊕⊕⊕⊖ | |
| Outcome | Tremelimumba + Durvalumab + Chemotherapy N=338 | Chemotherapy N=337 | Effect Estimate | GRADE | |||
| Study of Durvalumab + Tremelimumab With Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone for Patients With Lung Cancer (POSEIDON): ClinicalTrials.gov 2022. Study of Durvalumab + Tremelimumab With Chemotherapy or Durvalumab With Chemotherapy or Chemotherapy Alone for Patients With Lung Cancer (POSEIDON). **** | |||||||
| Dichotomous Outcomes | |||||||
| EORTC QLQ-C30 (Global Health Status) - TTD | N=319 | 8.3 [6.4; 10.2] | N=318 | 5.6 [4.4; 7.5] | ⊕⊖⊖⊖b | ||
| AE (Any) | N=330 | 309 (93.64%) | N=333 | 301 (90.39%) | RR 1.04 [0.99; 1.084]; p=0.1237 | ⊕⊕⊕⊖ | |
| SAE (Any) | N=330 | 146 (44.24%) | N=337 | 117 (34.72%) | RR 1.27 [1.054; 1.541]; p=0.0124 | ⊕⊕⊕⊖ | |
| Outcome | Durvalumab + Chemotherapy N=338 | Chemotherapy N=337 | Effect Estimate | GRADE | |||
| Study of Durvalumab + Tremelimumab With Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone for Patients With Lung Cancer (POSEIDON): ClinicalTrials.gov 2022. Study of Durvalumab + Tremelimumab With Chemotherapy or Durvalumab With Chemotherapy or Chemotherapy Alone for Patients With Lung Cancer (POSEIDON). ***** | |||||||
| Dichotomous Outcomes | |||||||
| EORTC QLQ-C30 (Global Health Status) - TTD | N=321 | 7.8 [6.5; 9.5] | N=318 | 5.6 [4.4; 7.5] | ⊕⊕⊖⊖b | ||
| AE (Any) | N=334 | 302 (90.42%) | N=333 | 301 (90.39%) | RR 1 [0.952; 1.051]; p=0.9899 | ⊕⊕⊕⊖ | |
| SAE (Any) | N=334 | 134 (40.12%) | N=333 | 117 (35.14%) | RR 1.14 [0.939; 1.389]; p=0.1849 | ⊕⊕⊕⊖ | |
| *Database cutoff: 11.03.2021 **Database cutoff: 11.03.2021 ***Database cutoff: 09.03.2021 ****Database cutoff: 10.03.2021 *****Database cutoff: 10.03.3021 |
|||||||
| 1: indirekter Vergleich nach Bucher | |||||||
| a: Fehlende Einzelauswertung der Komponenten des zusammengesetzten Endpunktes (Progression); b: Keine Effektschätzer berichtet | |||||||
| AE: Adverse Events; Any: Any Grade; CTCAE ≥3: Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Grade ≥3; DOR: Duration Of Response; EORTC QLQ-C30: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30; Global Health Status: Global Health Status; MCID: Minimal Clinically Important Difference; ORR: Objective Response Rate; OS: Overall Survival; PFS: Progression-Free Survival; SAE: Serious Adverse Events; TAE: Treatment-related Adverse Events; TAE-D: Treatment-related Adverse Events Leading to Death; TAE-Disc: Treatment-related Adverse Events Leading to Treatment Discontinuation; TirAE-D: Treatment-related immun-related Advers Events Leading to Death; TSAE: Treatment-related Serious Adverse Events; TTD: Time to Deterioration ; TuDD: Time to Definitive Deterioration | |||||||